3X^4.(-2X^3+5X^2-2/3X+1/3)
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Notice that function has the exat shape of function
, and it has just be translated to the right by 3 whole units.
Recall that horizontal translations to the right involve subtracting the number of units moved in the translation from the variable "x". therefore, in our case this means:
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
The answer to your question is c =
Step-by-step explanation:
Data
right triangle
short leg = 17 cm
long leg = 48 cm
hypotenuse = ?
Process
-Use the Pythagorean theorem to find the answer
c² = a² + b²
c = hypotenuse
a = short leg = 17 cm
b = long leg = 48 cm
- Substitution
c² = 17² + 48²
-Simplification
c² = 289 + 2304
c² = 2593
-Result
c =