Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": to raise competition among firms in the cartel.
Explanation:
A cartel is a group of companies or countries working together to regulate the price of a single product they produce in common. The cartel makes it impossible for a foreign business to enter the market and demand lower prices. Cartels are, in most cases, not helpful to customers. They generate high prices that remain unchanged until consumers find alternative ways to purchase the same items.
Under such a scenario,<em> cartels are unlikely to be formed to generate more competition among the companies that compose them.</em>
Based on one research of Baker, Silverstein, and Putney this situation is based on a paradigm of structural lag and political economy of aging. <span>The problem of grandparents' capacity to gain custody of their own grandchildren became the problem. </span><span>Which should be the question of how the government should support a family that has this kind of situation.</span>
I am definitely sure that correct statement should be completed like this: High levels of brand <span>resonance</span>, or the extent to which consumers feel they are "in sync" with the fox news brand, and engagement in fox news programs often leads to greater recall of the ads fox news runs. Brand resonances is the relationship between consumer and the product. It shows how the consumer can relate to it.
Answer:
The correct answer is e) The possibility of actual confusion.
Explanation:
The possibility of real confusion is when due to the identical characteristics of a service, product or name there is a possibility of confusion for customers.
For example, in the case of Joshua and his lawsuit against Sandy, the reason for the lawsuit is that he uses a name that already had a registered, he also considers that Sandy uses his service techniques, and this could affect his expansion.
Although Sandy denies what Joshua says, assuring that he only uses the name and the orange scarves on occasions. He does not believe that this is wrong, but for the resolution of the case, it must be considered that the trademark was registered by Joshua, for which if there is no agreement by both parties, using the name of "Tub & Dog" can be punished, and the actions that Sandy takes can cause real confusion when Joshua expands his business.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
<u> Fair Debt Collection Practices Act </u><u>(FDCPA) </u>Debt collectors are not allowed to use their positions to collect a debt using any manner of work performance that is found to be abusive, deceptive, or unethical.
FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act):
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is a federal law passed in 1977 to protect consumer rights from abusive, unfair, or deceptive debt collection practices.
The fair debt collection practices act prohibits abusive, unfair, or deceptive debt collection practices.
This act imposes certain restrictions on debt collectors, including the following:
- They are unable to contact you at an inconvenient time or location.
- They cannot harass or threaten you over the phone or in person.
- In case you have an attorney, then they must contact your attorney
Fair debt collection practices act covers the debts such as mortgages , medical debts, credit cards etc
Learn more about The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to visit this link
brainly.com/question/24138239
#SPJ4