The answer is 12. Next time try all of the answer option on your calculator first. I just tried each one
An integer may be a multiple of 3.
An integer may be 1 greater than a multiple of 3.
An integer may be 2 greater than a multiple of 3.
It is redundant to say an integer is 3 greater than a multiple of 3 (that's just a multiple of 3, we've got it covered). Same for 4, 5, 6, 7...
Let's consider a number which is a multiple of 3. Clearly, we can write 3+3+3+3+... until we reach the number. It can be written as only 3's.
Let's consider a number which is 2 greater than a multiple of 3. If we subtract 5 from that number, it'll be a multiple of 3. That means we can write the number as 5+3+3+3+3+... Of course, the number must be at least 8.
Let's consider a number which is 1 greater than a multiple of 3. If we subtract 5 from that number, it'll be 2 greater than a multiple of 3. If we subtract another 5, it'll be a multiple of 3. That means we can write the number as 5+5+3+3+3+3+... Of course, the number must be at least 13.
That's it. We considered all the numbers. We forgot 9, 10, 11, and 12, but these are easy peasy.
Beautiful question.
The x-intercepts are -6 (put the radical over the 6) and 6 (put the radical over it) or if you need the simplified version they are -2.44 and 2.44
Answer:
1464
Step-by-step explanation:
12x122=1464
Given :
Han says that we can wrap a 5 foot rope around a wheel with a 2 foot rope.
To Find :
It this true or false.
Solution :
Radius of wheel, r = 1 foot.
Circumference of wheel is given by :
Since, circumference is greater than 5 foot, therefore, we cannot wrap a 5-foot rope around a wheel with a 2-foot diameter.
Hence, this is the required solution.
