Answer:
a) The number of visits between the patrons who buys the season passes shows higher frequency than those who did not buy season passes, in general. However, the minimum value of 1 visit is present for both cases.
b) The mean visits of the patrons are just PARAMETERS. If you want to test your hypothesis using hypothesis testing, the statistics are the z or t scores comparing the parameters (means).
c) The proportion who would have paid less are those with 2 or fewer visits because they would only just paid $82 instead of $100.
Number of patrons with 2 or fewer visits: 16
Total number of patrons who bought season passes: 30
Proportion who would've paid less = 16/30 = 0.5333
Step-by-step explanation:
I just did it
$3, $1, $5, $2, $3, $9, $1 = $24 - $1 = $23 - $1 = $22.
$22 is the estimation of the bill when all of the amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The estimation is greater than the total bill which is 23 cents less than the estimation. The total on the register is reasonable and accurate.
Answer:
0.63%
Step-by-step explanation:
its literally in between the numbers
It seems that the y-intercept is 1, so you will be adding 1 to the equation. When you make a chart, you find that each number grows by 1 as well.
From this information, you will find that the answer is
y = x + 1
