<em>Answer</em><em>:</em>
<em>B</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>E</em><em>V</em><em>E</em><em>R</em><em>Y</em><em>O</em><em>N</em><em>E</em><em> </em><em>D</em><em>E</em><em>C</em><em>I</em><em>D</em><em>E</em><em>S</em><em> </em><em>T</em><em>O</em><em> </em><em>E</em><em>A</em><em>T</em><em> </em><em>L</em><em>O</em><em>W</em><em> </em><em>C</em><em>A</em><em>R</em><em>B</em>
<em>H</em><em>O</em><em>P</em><em>E</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em>T</em><em> </em><em>H</em><em>E</em><em>L</em><em>P</em><em>S</em><em> </em><em>Y</em><em>O</em><em>U</em>
<em>T</em><em>H</em><em>A</em><em>N</em><em>K</em><em> </em><em>YOU</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
It depends on the like city or whatever but it’s true in most parts
Answer:
Invoking original jurisdiction is the only nonappeal way in which cases can reach the Court.
Explanation:
.....
Answer i would add divorsing by the law bc sometimes death would happen so make where the court makes the decision to devorse.
Explanation:
I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.
<h3>Who is a Defendant?</h3>
This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.
It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.
Read more about Defendant here brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ1