Answer:
The advantage of 2nd one is no partner is needed, Less energy is required. Disadvantage is no variation for genetic problems, The offspring will have everything of the parent. For the 1st one reproduction advantage Is a higher survival rate. Disadvantage is a lot of energy is needed Because it requires a ( male and female)
Would it be predators? Because predators can catch weaker older deer easier than younger healthier ones.
Answer:
1. Supplying
2. Taking
Explanation:
Food chain is a linear relationship between organisms that depicts the flow of energy from one organism to another. In a food chain, organisms are arranged in trophic levels where arrows pointing to the right direction (➡) are used to show that the organim the arrow is pointing to eats the organism behind it.
Hence, according to this question, arrows in a food chain point from the organism SUPPLYING the energy to the organism TAKING the energy.
Options found elsewhere:
-always genetically identical to one parent
-always genetically identical to both parents
-never genetically identical to one parent
-sometimes genetically different than both parents
Answer:
-sometimes genetically different than both parents
Explanation:
Protists are eukaryotes that cannot be classed as animals, plants, or fungi. They are quite diverse. Examples include amoeba, plasmodium, and slime mould.
Because they are so diverse, protists also have very different modes of reproduction. Some protists undergo asexual reproduction, where they simply make a copy of themselves without a mate. Others undergo sexual reproduction.
Therefore, the only option that can be correct is "-sometimes genetically different than both parents" .
If they were always genetically identical to one parent or both parents, that would mean that sexual reproduction could not be possible. If they were never genetically identical to one parent, that would mean that asexual reproduction could not be taking place.
Answer:a. Draw Punnett squares for each couple (you may need to do more than 1 square/ couple)
Baby 2 MUST belong to the Browns because Mr. Brown is the only parent with an A allele to
contribute… then the rest works out as follows:
b. To which parents does baby #1 belong? Why? Hint you may want to refer to your Punnett
squares.
Baby 1 must belong to the Smiths, because they are the only ones with the possibility of EACH
having a recessive allele to pass down to the baby, Mr. Brown has type AB blood and therefore
only has the dominant A and dominant B alleles – no recessive allele possible.
Explanation:
