In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
<h3>What is the variables about?</h3>
Note that:
y=-8x+4
y-4=-8x
(y-4)/-8=x
Since the independent variable x is known, one can switch the variable labels and thus it will be:
y=(x-4)/-8
f^-1(x)=(x-4)/-8
This can be written again as:
f^-1(x)=(4-x)/8 :P
Thus one can say No, as he forgot to switch the variable labels after solving for the independent variable.
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
See the first part of the question below
Talib is trying to find the inverse of the function to the right. His work appears beneath it. Is his work correct? Explain your answer.
Learn more about variable from
brainly.com/question/4063302
#SPJ1
Step-by-step explanation:
so let's assume they both sold for 100 each the first article sold for 10% laws there by cost of article is 111.11 rounded the second article made 25% profit so cost must be 80 total cost is 8.89 or 5% profit I'm so sorry if im wrong
Answer:
3/12 or simplified 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
First make the denominators the same. We can make 12 the common denominator. To make 3/4 have a denominator do the following:
Multiply the numerator and denominator by 3 since 4x3=12. The new number becomes 9/12.
Then subtract:
9/12-6/12=3/12 The numerator subtracts while the denominator stays the same.
We can simplify 3/12 to 1/4
Answer:
the statement is false there is no solution
Step-by-step explanation:
step 1 -7(a-3)=11-7a
step 2 -7a+21=11-7a
step 3 cancel out the -7a's
step 4 you are left with 21=11 which does not work so it is false
Answer:
there are 6 baby dinos and 2
Step-by-step explanation:
