These are three questions:
1. <span>Teamwork can be frustrating because of all except:
satisfaction from group success
personal interaction.
the hassles of group work.
people who do not do their share.
Now, we are looking for something positive, because we are looking for a reason why team work is NOT frustrating. The correct answer is "</span> satisfaction from group success ". A success of the group can make all the group members happy and can strengthen the relationship in the group. Think for example the happiness of the members of a soccer team after a goal - even the members who are not currently playing are happy.<span>
2. teamwork can be motivating because of all except:
the satisfaction of group victory.
interaction.
relationship building.
self-reliance.
Here "</span>self-reliance" is the correct answer, as there is little self-reliance in the group. Instead, you rely on the other team members and they rely on you - there is a mutual reliance in the group. This mutual reliance can also be a positive thing, but self-reliance is not a part of group work.<span>
3.some people have a preference for individual work because of all except:
they welcome the opinions of others.
they prefer individual tasks.
they can rely on themselves.
they like to do their own work.
Here the correct answer is "</span>they welcome the opinions of others" - this will be something that can be found in a group work, not in an individual work, since if you work alone, there is noone to provide you with their feedback! If they want to have access to the opinion of others and to the feedback of others, they should consider group work instead!
Answer:
yes, it could be used.
Explanation:
Engels work, relating to unfavorable working conditions, relates directly to the time and place of the diary´s entry, and for that reason, it could be used as a firsthand personal illustration of Engel´s thesis. Nevertheless, it should be treated as merely one example, one single viewpoint, upon a problem whose context and dimensions are far greater than one man´s perspective; that is to say, the entry diary can work as one historical source amongst the many more that a reliable argument should employ in trying to support and fundament Engel´s thesis.
The floor leaders and whips of each party are elected by a majority vote of all senators from their party gathered in a conference, also known as a caucus. Traditionally, the leader is elected for a two-year term at the start of each Congress.
<h3>What is caucus?</h3>
A gathering of supporters or members of a certain political party or movement is known as a caucus. The precise term varies depending on the nation and political system.
The phrase first appeared in the United States, where it can refer to a gathering of political party members to nominate candidates, make plans for future legislation, and other activities in the United States Congress or other comparable representative bodies of government. It has spread to some Commonwealth nations, such as Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa, where it typically refers to a regular gathering of all members of Parliament (MPs) who are affiliated with a parliamentary party. In such a setting, a party caucus can be quite powerful because it has the authority to choose or remove the party's parliamentary leader.
To learn more about caucus visit:
brainly.com/question/17032678
#SPJ4
Answer:
War of 1812, (June 18, 1812–February 17, 1815), conflict fought between the United States and Great Britain over British violations of U.S. maritime rights. It ended with the exchange of ratifications of the Treaty of Ghent.
