Answer: Behavior like group discussion in absence of management team members, collecting contact information of co-workers, forming new alliance with co-workers etc indicates organizing activity is taking place.
Explanation:
According to the question any organization for certain program or event that is taking place in company without knowledge of managers can be known through following
- Many group discussion taking place between co-workers in working area, cafeteria etc without presence of managers
- Collection of contact information for contact people for organizing activity
- Employee who used to talk or chat with managers earlier lessen their conversations with them
- New employee are seen getting connected wit co-workers
- Employee are indulged in other activities as well also with working
Answer:The NATO Agreement
Explanation:
We can conclude the passage is from a medieval period because it includes a monarch that rules or has power over other social classes (third option).
One of the characteristics that made Medieval society to be different from other societies was its social structure. In this social structure, the monarchy represented by the king, queen, or prince was the most powerful social class.
This means this class had power over others including knights, noblemen, and peasants. This characteristic is shown in the passage because Prine John is announced with trumpets and seems to be protected and respected by others including "horsemen, horsewomen, and foot-passengers."
Note: This question is incomplete because the passage it refers to is missing; here is the passage:
About the hour of ten o’clock, the whole plain was crowded with horsemen, horsewomen, and foot-passengers, hastening to the tournament; and shortly after, a grand flourish of trumpets announced Prince John and his retinue, attended by many of those knights who meant to take share in the game, as well as others who had no such intention.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/13326322
The APA or American Psychological Association has 2 amendments. These are:
1.Conflicts Between Ethics and Law, Regulations, or Other Governing Legal Authority.
If psychologists’ moral authority and leadership conflict with the law, protocols, or other governing lawful authority, psychologists elucidate the nature of the struggle, make known their pledge to the Ethics Code and take sensible steps to resolve the conflict reliable with the said rules and regulation.
2. Conflicts Between Ethics and Organizational Demands.
If the commands or requests of a society with which an expert or specialist in psychology is associated or for whom they are employed are in contrasts with this Ethics Code, an expert or specialist in psychology explain the nature of the conflict, make known their obligation to the Ethics Code.
It all means that an expert or specialist in psychology can unable to use moral values from the code to validate, legalize or defend the defilement of human rights
