A
900 a piece
negative 12.50 because it's a loss of money
The answer to these two questions are not the same. We don't agree with Noah.
Reason:
Let's start with the first question.
1. Given: rate = 10% increase, base/original number = 550 bison
10% of 550 is:
10% of 550 is 55. Hence, there is an increase of 55 bison this year. This year, there are 550 + 55 = 605 bison in the herd.
2. Given: rate = 10% decrease, percentage/final number = 550 bison
Applying the concept of Percentage = Base x Rate, we can get the Base or the original number of bison before the decrease by dividing Percentage over Rate.
Filling in the formula with the given values in question 2, we have:
Last year, there were 611 bison.
As we can see, the answer for number 1 is 605 bison while the answer for the number 2 is 611 bison. The answer of the two questions are not the same.
a) Proof by contradiction is different from traditional proof as it accepts a single example showing that a statement is false, instead of having the need to derive a general relationship for all input values.
b) The statement is true by contradiction as the sum of the measures is of 160º, and not 180º.
<h3>What are supplementary angles?</h3>
Two angles are called supplementary angles if the sum of their measures has a value of 180º.
The measures of the angles in this problem are given as follows:
Then the sum of the measures of this angles is given as follows:
90 + 70 = 160º.
Which is a different sum of 160º, confirming the statement that the angles are not supplementary by contradiction.
A similar problem, involving proof by contradiction and supplementary angles, is presented at brainly.com/question/28889480
#SPJ1
Answer:
the answer is 2. (6 and 4)
Step-by-step explanation:
6 + 4 = 10
As for the domain, the only restriction comes from the logarithm. The argument of a logarith must be strictly positive, so we have
As for the range, we have:
- The range of
are all real numbers - If we change to
we're translating the function horizontally, so the range remains the same - If we change to
we're stretching the function horizontally, so the range doesn't change - If we change to
we're translating the function 1 unit up, but the range is already all the real numbers, so it doesn't change.
