In my view Hedda Gabbler is the most morally ambiguous between the two. Allow me to compare the two characters in order to clarify my views. Hedda Gabbler is an older Norwegian housewife of upper-*Middle class who chose to marry because she was starting to grow older. Her motivations are not always clear and sometimes it seems as though she suffers some kind of mental illness. Also, the etymology of her name is quite revelatory, her name comes from " the Germanic name Hadewig, derived from the Germanic elements hadu "battle, combat" and wig "war" (https://www.behindthename.com/name/hedwig). Hedda is obviously in conflict with the patriarchal society of her time and she aims to not only be in command of her own destiny but also to control her husband. She kills herself in order to deny the power of a man over her. Even in her death she is defiant. Daisy Miller on the other hand is a very young adult and rich American who loves Europe and its ways. She is naive and innocent and her behavior is not as vindictive as the behavior of Hedda Gabbler. Daisy is in opposition to the conservative and patriarchal views of society more because of her exposition ot European cultures and less due to a conscious realization of her condition. Her name is the name of a flower and her death is also symbolic as she dies from malaria. Flowers die during winter and Daisy's winter is the disease that kills her. She is more a victim than a proto-feminist.
Is it just one answer or more than one??
Have a great base and a great subject
Answer:
I looked it up but u can put it in ur own words if u want
Explanation:
While unmarried girls were supposed to follow their fathers and married women follow their husbands, widows had no male figure to guide them. Puritan widows could sue or be sued in a court of law, could own land, and could discipline any children or servants in their households
Answer:Select all the correct answers.
Which two concerns regarding weapons of mass destruction does the National Nuclear Security Administration deal with in collaboration with the United Nations?
the misuse of weapons of mass destruction by rogue nations
terrorists obtaining weapons of mass destruction
advances in weapons of mass destruction by Russia
nuclear testing by China
maintenance of weapons of mass destruction in Europe
Explanation: