The roots of the polynomial <span><span>x^3 </span>− 2<span>x^2 </span>− 4x + 2</span> are:
<span><span>x1 </span>= 0.42801</span>
<span><span>x2 </span>= −1.51414</span>
<span><span>x3 </span>= 3.08613</span>
x1 and x2 are in the desired interval [-2, 2]
f'(x) = 3x^2 - 4x - 4
so we have:
3x^2 - 4x - 4 = 0
<span>x = ( 4 +- </span><span>√(16 + 48) </span>)/6
x_1 = -4/6 = -0.66
x_ 2 = 2
According to Rolle's theorem, we have one point in between:
x1 = 0.42801 and x2 = −1.51414
where f'(x) = 0, and that is <span>x_1 = -0.66</span>
so we see that Rolle's theorem holds in our function.
Answer:No Matt's calculation is not correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to multiply by the number of the area.If it is 4 inches we multiply by 4
15 x 4 =60
A=4 inches squared
A=LxW (length x width )
so you can say that:
Matt is incorrect because He skipped the step of multiplying 2 by 2 in the formula which is where we get 4 from.
Where an, an-1,a2, a1, a0 are constants. We call the term containing the highest power of x the leading term, and we call an the leading coefficient. The degree of the polynomial is the power of x in the leading term. We have already seen degree 0, 1, and 2 polynomials which were the constant, linear, and quadratic functions, respectively. Degree 3, 4, and 5
