Most fundamental human qualities are displayed by Grendel. He was an intelligent monster with the irrational thoughts capability. He shares the lineage with the human being, as being a descendant of the biblical Cain. Very little separates him from other human beings due to his nasty eating habits and awful appearance. Moreover, he accentuates the inherent violence of man. This highlights his philosophical quest is of human-like. By the wasteful war he feels disgusted on the other hand he is easily upset and cautious.
Grendel's relationship with the humans is characterized by the emotional response to the concept of community. Grendel is frustrated with the world he is living in, the animals that surround him are dumb and undignified. Further, that his mother is driven by the emotional instincts. Therefore, Grendel is trapped in his own world where he performs one-way communication by talking to the sky or air with no response.
The human who resembles Grendel in many ways, most painful refusal comes from them as they fret and disgust to share any meaningful conversation with Grendel. Yet Grendel, so close to humankind he is kept at a distance. Grendel's tragic status is underscored by the Shaper's Tale of Cain and Abel ( two sons of Adam and Eve).
In the Danes, Grendel instills horrendous fear. While the warriors sleep at Herot he attacks them and haunts marshes and moors. He feeds on human flesh and drinks human blood. Grendel has "Powerful jaws", "Swift hard claws", and "Great teeth" along with magical powers. Hence, he was emphasized as a horrible monster who was filled with blood lust and hatred. Therefore, Grendel is a monster whose inner self-resembles with that of humans and his physical appearance prevent him to enjoy the companionship and comfort of the civilization.
This is the complete question
O A.
The new definition for planets needs to be considered as settled moving forward.
OB.
The IAU used poor methods when setting a new definition for planets.
OC.
It is uncertain whether the definition of planet will remain the same in the future.
OD
Pluto should not have been the reason why IAU changed the definition of planets.
It is uncertain whether the definition of the planet will remain the same in the future. Thus, option "C" is correct.
<h3>What is the description of planets?</h3>
The description of planets has been updated by the International Astronomical Union. In the current description, the planet is regarded if it satisfies three criteria.
It will be in the sun's direction, it should have enough mass to have stable hydro stability, and the area should be clear. It is unclear if the definition will stay the same in the world because certain planets will convey such distinctive features and the concept may be modified.
Thus, option "C" is correct.
To learn more about planets click here:
brainly.com/question/14581221
#SPJ1
Answer:
hope that this was what you were looking for
Explanation:
what was the person wearing?
how tall where they?
what color are their eyes?
what color was their hair?
what kind of car were they driving?
<span>D)
Reading my favorite book, I saw that the pages began to fall out.</span>
Answer:
1. The writer claims that not everyone is suited to attend a four-year college, and that more alternatives, such as a vocational-technical education, should be offered to students. The writer begins by providing personal experiences he has had with parents and describing the lengths parents go to in order to get their children into college. Then he scales up the argument and discusses how consultants, universities, and even college presidents contribute to the elite mindset of a four-year college education. Finally, he explains the “absurdity” and provides examples for four-year college alternatives and their success. RI.9-10.2
