Answer:
7
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: (E) Not necessarily, because this wasn't an experiment
Step-by-step explanation:
As much as the results would suggest that the fast-paced music was responsible for the faster finishing time, this conclusion cannot be authoritatively made because this was not technically an experiment but rather a test to satisfy curiosity.
An experiment is planned and is scientific. It has more stringent requirements that ensure causation that Roshanda did not meet before she engaged in this trial so we cannot say for a fact that her findings are objective.
Answer: Its light-collecting area would be 25 times greater than that of the 10-meter keck telescope.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. To solve this problem you must apply the formula for calculate the area of a circle, which is shown below:

Where<em> r</em> is the radius of the circle.
2. The diameter of a circle is:

Where <em>r</em> is the radius of the circle.
3. Therefore, keeping this on mind, you have that the light-collecting area of a 50-meter keck telescope is:

4. And the light-collecting area of a 10-meter keck telescope is:

5. Divide
by
, then:

6. Therefore, its light-collecting area would be 25 times greater than that of the 10-meter keck telescope.
Answer:
We conclude that the list which
shows values in order from LEASE to GREATEST is:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the values




Writing all the values from LEASE to GREATEST
3.0625, 4.210, 5, 5.477
OR
,
,
,
,
Therefore, from the given answer options, we conclude that the list which
shows values in order from LEASE to GREATEST is: