All categories

3 years ago

3.5 m

Mathematics

1 answer:

marysya [2.9K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

This question seems to be incomplete, I guess that we have a circular pool, with a diameter of 3.5 m.

Now, the circunference of a circle can be written as:

C = 2*pi*r

where:

pi = 3.14

r = radius = half of the diameter = 3.5m/2 = 1.75m

Then replacing those values in the equation for the circumference we have:

C = 2*3.14*1.75m = 10.99 m.

And knowing that the value of pi is actually larger than 3.14 (pi = 3.1415926535....)

We can safely round up the circumference to the next whole number, C = 11m

You might be interested in

How do you get the answer for .0003 is 1/10 of?

Hitman42 [59]

0.0003 would be 1/10 of 0.00003. If you divided 0.00003 by 10 you would get 0.0003. In fraction form it is 3/10,000

Hoped this helped.

5 0

3 years ago

Divide and answer in simplest form: 1/3 divided by 5

disa [49]

Answer:

1/15

Step-by-step explanation:

1. You can divide 1/3 by 5 by changing the division symbol to its reciprocal, multiplication, and also divide by the reciprocal of the number after the symbol, 5. The reciprocal of 5 is 1/5.

2. Now you can do 1/3 multiplied by 1/5. Multiply the numerators by the denominators. The numerators are 1 and 1, so you multiply 1 by 1 which equals 1. Now you multiply the denominators, 3 and 5, which is equal to 15. If the numerator is now 1, and the denominator is 15, the new fraction is 1/15, getting you to your answer

7 0

3 years ago

You are given the system of equations to solve by the elimination method, which is an INCORRECT step that will NOT produce a

SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer: multiply x by 2 in the first equation and subtract the second equation

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve a system of linear equations by elimination method , our first step is to make its (either x or y) coefficient same.

For that we multiply a number to both sides of the equation not to only one term.

So by checking all the given options it is pretty clear that the last option is not applicable for elimination method because in this 2 is multiplied to only one term, which proceeds to loose the balance of the equation.

Thus , an INCORRECT step that will NOT produce a system with the same solution is "multiply x by 2 in the first equation and subtract the second equation ".

6 0

3 years ago

X-1.6=2.4+0.8x solve for x. <br><br>What did I do wrong?

trapecia [35]

$\bf x-1.6=2.4+0.8x\implies \stackrel{\textit{subtracting 2.4}}{x-4=0.8x}\implies \stackrel{\textit{subtracting x}}{-4=0.8x-x} \\\\\\ -4=-0.2x\implies \cfrac{-4}{-0.2}=x\implies 20=x$

3 0

3 years ago

juilo is paid 1.4 times his normal hourly rate for each hour he works over 30 hours in a week. Last week he worked 35hours and e

Licemer1 [7]

Let x be Juilo's normal hourly rate.

so for the 35 hr week we have:-

30x + 5*1.4x = 436.60

37x = 436.60

x = 436.60 / 37 = $11.80

His normal hourly rate = $11.80

So for a 30 hr week he will earn 11.80 * 30 = $354

So the amount $436.60 is a reasonable figure for a 35 hr week.

4 0

3 years ago