Answer:
The assumptions that can be made from this statement are:
1. The individual's bone was strongest from front to back.
2. The individual was physically active
Explanation:
If behaviors and characteristics of individuals during their lifetimes are determined through studying bones, it means
*The individual's bone was strongest from front to back - overall, human bone strength has declined dramatically over the past 10, 000 years. However there is significant variation between population showing the localised nature of the shift from foraging to farming
*The individual was physically active - the elongated shape of the bone shows that this person was physically active in life
Answer:
Authoritative Parenting
Explanation:
Authoritative Parenting is a parenting style characterized by the imposition of strongly established boundaries. Although parents who adopt Authoritative Parenting provide some emotional support, this kind of parenting does not consider the learning process and the child's ability to take responsibility. It is the controlling style that ignores growth and maturity and does not rest even on what you have tried to transfer to your child.
Children in this parenting style are experts at managing appearance, behaving seemingly consistent with their parents' wishes, but at the first opportunity do not hesitate to break the rules.
<span>Kate Choplin believe marriage is a form of slavery. for women because women have to take vows to honor and obey her husband, meaning that they end up being forced to do house chores and be a housewife. Wives must live for their husband, which means they must consider them over their own well being in the 19th century, so unfortunately, the character illustrating the point became so overwhelmed by the joy of her freedom when she though her husband had died and had effectively given her her freedom back that she literally died from the joy.</span>
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
