Answer:
Mexico, Canada, Jomanaca, Peru, Russia
Explanation:
I searched it.
Answer:
C. Some southern leaders promoted industrialization as progress.
Explanation:
This answer is supported by the source because Henry W. Grandy states in his writing that the South has now become loyal to the Union and they have accepted their defeat. He also states that "the new South presents a perfect democracy" which shows that they are accepting the ways of the industrial north.
Maybe while we wait for the questioner to provide the options, we can do a little general discussion here about what it means to use a primary source. Primary sources are things that come from persons directly involved in the events or lives being studied. So, any diary entries or letters of George Washington himself would count as primary sources. So would any official proclamations or letters or government documents that came from Washington's pen as president. Or the testimony of contemporaries of his who lived or worked with him would also count as primary source accounts.
So if you're looking for a historian's use of primary sources, look for the ways in which he's using historical material directly connected to the life of the person being studied. In fact, if you were able to look at a set of the false teeth George Washington wore, that would be a primary source too. They have a set at the Mount Vernon home/museum. And by looking at those actual dentures, you'd see they weren't made out of wood like the old (false) story says!
Answer:
The Marbury v madison case
Explanation:
This was a very important case because of 2 differences, At the time there was The federalists and the anti federalists. The federalist believed in a strong central government while the others believes in a strong state government. Then later the ratification of the constitution happened. The acts that brought the united states down occurs( the embargo act). Eventually there was a court case called the marbury v madison. This case resulted in judicial review. Without judicial review the united states would not be the same. I say this because the government could have just passed laws whenever. Judicial review has changed the way the government looks at laws..
A. It quickly spread throughout Middle East and North Africa
