1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pochemuha
2 years ago
6

Cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a:

Law
1 answer:
OverLord2011 [107]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

It would be heard in a <em>Federal Court.</em>

Cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a<em> Federal Court.</em>

<h3><em>I hope this helped at all.</em></h3>

You might be interested in
Does a lawyer who has been practicing law in Colorado for 1 year moves to Minnesota, will he have to take the bar exam in Minnes
Ray Of Light [21]
You are ready to be a lawyer
7 0
3 years ago
what describes the act of "intentionally causing another person to fear immediate bodily harm or death or intentionally inflicti
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

suna la poliție, sper ca te-am ajutat

Explanation:

urmărește Mă, dau corana

5 0
2 years ago
The chief purpose for using informants is
liq [111]

<u>Answer:</u>

The chief purpose for using informants is to provide probable cause for arrests and search warrants.

Option: (D)

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • An informant is the person or group that provides the important information related to the crime.
  • So based on these informants information it is easier for the concerned authority to provide the search and investigation warrants.
  • So, it is very important for the informant to be genuine and trusted.
  • These informants may be eye witness, or criminal informant known as confidential human source.
3 0
4 years ago
Defenses to strict liability are that strict liability should not apply or that there is no causation or damages.
levacccp [35]
The answer to the questions is true
3 0
2 years ago
Waterfront Hotels Corporation in Boston offers a job to Carol, who lives in Denver. Carol orally agrees to work for Waterfront f
Aneli [31]

Answer: Waterfront Hotels.

Explanation: The lack of an official, written agreement will make the court likely to rule in favor of Waterfront Hotels.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following demonstrates proper business etiquette?
    15·1 answer
  • How many injuries are there in the state of Oregon each year due to DUIs
    6·1 answer
  • police officers investigate local crimes and may arrest those accused of breaking local laws. Which group has a similar role at
    11·1 answer
  • 5. (56) What is written on a death certificate in the C.O.D. can't be identified?​
    7·1 answer
  • Is south African law codified???​
    7·1 answer
  • Scientific racism according to rattansi 2007
    10·1 answer
  • What is corn hub plz help asap send email
    12·1 answer
  • Identify the 4 types of laws and give an example of each plz
    5·2 answers
  • 13. The "strict scrutiny" standard invalidated certain affirmative action policies whose focus was not narrow enough.
    6·1 answer
  • What is the first step in selecting US citizens to serve as members of a Jurt?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!