1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wittaler [7]
3 years ago
5

Supreme Court. Jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees

and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. Jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level, skipping over all those "lesser" judges. Jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury. Although he is not a lawyer, Jim believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that the justices will appreciate his attempt to make things better for the employees involved. Regardless of what court is involved, can Jim act as plaintiff for the employees? Multiple Choice Yes, so long as he gives any money he receives to them No, because venue is lacking Yes, so long as they file no objection No, because he lacks standing Yes, so long as he gets permission slips from them
Law
1 answer:
Irina18 [472]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: No, because he lacks standing

Explanation:

As a private citizen who is not a lawyer, Jim cannot represent his fellow employees as that would require being a lawyer. Were he representing himself alone, he would have been allowed to represent himself.

As a non-lawyer however, he cannot represent multiple people as plaintiff. He therefore has no legal standing to do so.

You might be interested in
1. Where is the line drawn between religion and public schools?
Over [174]

Answer:

religion is something you learn about but you can not share your beliefs with the school and teachers aren't allowed to preach their religions.

some schools allow prayer in sports but it is not a mandatory thing.

I still believe that it is not a good thing to put religion beliefs and school together because then if u don't believe in someone elses religion it can cause problems which will revolve in exclusion and fights about religion.

It depends on what it is used for and if they are making it a mandatory thing or not.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Under the Uniform Securities Act, the limited registration provision available to Canadian broker-dealers and their agents permi
Tanzania [10]

Answer and Explanation:

Under the Uniform Securities Act, the limited registration provision available to Canadian broker-dealers and their agents permit such broker-dealers to conduct businesses with interested people who reside in Canada; in addition, broker-dealers can also conduct businesses with Canadians who plan to reside in the state on a temporary basis, and whom they were already familiar with, prior to the time they came to the United States.

4 0
3 years ago
The work of a group that regulates relations between various criminal enterprises involved in the smuggling and sale of drugs, p
Valentin [98]

The work of a group that regulates relations between various criminal enterprises involved in the smuggling and sale of drugs, prostitution, gambling, and other illegal activities is called Organized

Crime.

<h3>What is  OrganizedCrime?</h3>

Organized crime refers to global, national, or local groups of highly centralised criminal businesses that engage in illicit conduct, most typically for profit.

Members of organised criminal groups enjoy a sense of prestige, power, and protection in addition to money. Groups, like legal enterprises, have a pyramid power structure.

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), enacted in 1970, is a federal statute aimed at combating organised crime in the United States. It allows for civil and criminal consequences for racketeering activities carried out as part of a continuing criminal enterprise.

To know more about  OrganizedCrime follow the link:

brainly.com/question/10571360

#SPJ4

3 0
2 years ago
How does an appellate court differ from a trial court?
Aleksandr [31]

Answer: B

Explanation: Appellate courts focus on questions of law, NOT on questions of facts like the trial courts. The appellate judges want to know whether the law was applied accurately. The appellate court overrules a trial court decision only if a very important legal error was made in the trial court.

5 0
3 years ago
In which diagram are the steps listed in chronological order?
STALIN [3.7K]

Answer:

B. would be the best answer

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A ______ is formed by a group of people who become its members and deposit their money with the institution. They can take loans
    15·1 answer
  • What is the highest ranking for a police officer in San Diego
    6·2 answers
  • The reason for allowing discovery is ?
    10·1 answer
  • How do i email Brainly about resetting my password because i forget and can send to my student email.
    10·2 answers
  • Hey so...legality question...if someone has the time and knowledge
    8·2 answers
  • I rp rp rpr pr r<br> hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    10·1 answer
  • Chính quyền và mỗi công dân cần làm gì để hiến pháp đc tôn trọng nhất
    12·2 answers
  • What is the Top 10 deadliest animals in the world. Please Help Please
    13·1 answer
  • Under what circumstances may a president be sued
    10·1 answer
  • Economic Survey
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!