Andrew is showing his work in simplifying −4.5 + 4.2 + 5.6 − 7.3. Identify any errors in his work or in his reasoning.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Yes there is sufficient evidence to reject the company's evidence
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is n = 25
The mean is
The standard deviation is
The z-score is z = -1.94
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
Generally the p-value is mathematically evaluated as
From the z table the area under the normal curve to the left corresponding to -1.94 is
=>
=>
Let assume the level of significance is
Hence the this mean that
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is sufficient evidence to reject the company's evidence