Answer:
Ethics
Explanation:
Ethics also called moral philosophy involves how an individual systemises, defends and recommends the concept of right or wrong.
Summer is facing an ethical decision of either returning the bag or keeping it for herself. Her decision will be based on her definition of right or wrong.
If her moral philosophy is one that does not see theft as something that is wrong, she will decide to keep the bag. If on the other hand she sees keeping the bag that is not her own as wrong she will decide to return it.
Answer:
The answer is that the net income under absorption costing would be higher than the net income under variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing are terms used in accounting contexts. Absorption costing, also known as full costing, incurs overhead costs when the product is sold; not before it. Variable costing, also referred to as direct costing, would include overhead costs during the period the costs occurred. In this condition, net income would be higher using absorption since overhead costs would not be included until the product is sold.
6 Months can be a life insurance policy normally be backdated from the date of the application.
For Example:- Suppose, he/she purchased a policy with maturity duration of 20 years in March 2022 and backdated it to October 2021, the maturity benefits of the endowment policy can be reaped a year before in October 2041 than the initial date in March 2042.
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
The adjusted journal entry is shown below:
Unearned rent revenue A/c Dr
To Rent revenue A/c
(Being the adjusted entry of rent is recorded)
The computation of the rent revenue is shown below:
= Received amount × number of months ÷ (total number of months in a year)
= $32,400 × (5 months ÷ 12 months)
= $13,500
The 5 months is calculated from August 1 to December 31
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
