Answer:
The future value is $6,894.21
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Dominic Joseph deposits $5,000 in a new savings account. The account pays 5.5 percent interest compounded annually.
To calculate the future value, we need to use the following formula:
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
PV= 5,000
i= 0.055
n=6
FV= 5,000*(1.055)^6= $6,894.21
Vasily pushes for an acquisition anyway. The reason for this acquisition is principal agent problem.
A conflict of interests between a person or group and the agent appointed to act on their behalf is known as the principal-agent dilemma. It is possible for an agent to do actions that are not in the principal's best interests.
The principal-agent problem is as complex as the range of principal and agent responsibilities. It can happen in any circumstance where the primary or owner of an asset transfers direct control of the asset to a third party or agent.
Agency costs are the possibility that the agent will take actions that are not in the principal's best interests. In order to align priorities and solve a principal-agent problem, the rewards system may need to be changed.
To know more about principal agent:
brainly.com/question/15847415
#SPJ4
<span>Since the business owner, by definition, is the person who controls all those assets and is responsible for them, he/she can take parts of them home if they so choose. This is a way to manage resources, especially if those resources are still useful in some way.</span>
Answer:
Tax on a case of cola is $4 per case.
The burden that falls on consumers is $1 per case.
The burden that falls on producers is $3 per case
False. This is due to the fact that producers already carry a greater share of the tax burden.
Explanation:
Tax on a case of cola = Amount that consumers pay after the tax has been charged - Amount producers receive = $7 - $3 = $4 per case
Burden on consumers = Amount consumers pay after the tax has been levied - Amount consumers pay before tax was levied = $7 - $5 = $1 per case
Burden on producers = Tax on a case of cola - Burden on consumers = $4 - $1 = $3 per case
False. This is due to the fact that producers already carry a greater share of the tax burden.
Answer:
Wide
Explanation:
Basically there are two spans of control namely; wide and narrow. A wide span of control is one in which a manager or supervisor interacts with many team members. In other words, the levels of hierarchy involved where there is a wide span of control is few. As such, this structure entails that a large number of the team members report directly to the manager.
The narrow span of control is one in which the manager supervises or interacts with a few team members. In other words, there is some level of hierarchy involved such that the managers direct subordinates are few and have subordinates who report to them.
To state it in another way, the wider the span of control, the fewer level of report or levels of hierarchy and the narrower the span of control, the higher the levels of hierarchy required.
In light of the explanation above, it can be deduced that Jody has a wide span of control over her team.
