Answer:
hope i help.
Explanation:
both of them are good bu i prefer parent
friend: you can share thing your scared to tell to your parents helps you be more confident and have fun whith them
parent: helps you whith everyithing makes you believe in yourself makes you stronger they can never leave you they help you first
To capitulate means to finally agree to do something you did not want to do in the first place. Usually, that agreement comes after consulting with other team members.
An army can capitulate to another army in a conflict when it cannot longer have any chance to defeat its opponent.
The answer to the question is false because, to capitulate or surrender means exactly the opposite to stand firm. Sometimes, you can capitulate under certain conditions or terms, which can be negotiated and in other times, you can capitulate or surrender completely outright.
After the United Sates lunched two atomic bombs in the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, The Japanese surrendered to the United states unconditionally. In other words, they capitulated thus avoiding any more lost of life.
Baron de Montesquieu:
- Born in France
- Basis of Ideals formed Branches of Government
- Separation of govt. powers
- Checks and Balances; One part of the govt. should stop the other.
- Defended equality
- Believed all things were made up of rules/laws that are not to be changed
Cesare Beccaria:
- Born in Italy
- Basis of Ideals in 8th amendment; Prisoner's rights.
- Promoted criminal justice
- Against torture and Capital punishiment
- Punishments should be for deterrence not vengeance
- Trials should be fair
- Cruel and unusual punishments should be abolished
Both:
- Influential Enlightenment thinkers
- worked with govt.
Answer:
B. All states splitting their electoral votes between the candidates based on what percentage of the popular vote they won
Explanation:
The reason why in the United States a candidate can become president while losing the popular vote is that most states (all of them except Nebraska and Main) allocate their electoral votes based on a winner-takes-all basis: that is, the candidate who obtains a plurality of votes gets all the electors.
If states instead awarded their electors on a proportional basis, it would be mathematically impossible for a candidate to lose the popular vote and still become president.
