Answer:
i believe the constitution would not allow for this change to occur, and if it was to be changed there would be a lot of informing inhabitants of changes to law, massive societal changes will occur from different beliefs in different states.
Answer: Defamation is "the action of damaging the good reputation of someone; slander or libel". Therefore no
Initially, a defendant's case is at a trial court (Federal, State, Circuit Courts).
Then the case proceeds to the Court of Appeal before finally moving to the Supreme Court of the state or at the federal level.
But it is not true that all cases must move to the Supreme Court when the defendant appeals. The movement to the highest court requires the acceptance of the defendant's argument and the merit of each case.
Thus, the defendant's case can move from a <em>trial court,</em><em> an </em><em>appeals court,</em><em> and then to the </em><em>supreme court.</em>
Learn more: brainly.com/question/11640159
Answer:
No, on the contrary, I am totally against the granting of extraordinary powers to any political leader, whatever the issue. On the contrary, I think that every government official must have limited powers, controlled by the other branches of government. In this way, they will not be able to exceed their prerogatives, affecting the freedoms and rights of citizens.
