Percentage change in quantity demanded/percentage change in price is the basic formula for the price elasticity of demand coefficient.
<h3 /><h3>What is price elasticity?</h3>
Price elasticity is the degree of an individual that person or a consumer can pay to the change in the price of the commodity, it is calculated the price a consumer is willing to pay versus the amount of quantity supplied to the person.
Thus, Percentage change in quantity demanded/percentage change in price
For more details about Price elasticity, click here:
brainly.com/question/13565779
#SPJ1
Answer:
There would be NO IMPACT
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about, rialto company collected $5,000 on account. In this case there will be no impact of this transaction on the firm's current ratio. The collection on account can be regarded as exchange of asset transaction, any increase change in current asset account cash, then there will be decreases in Accounts Receivable , the ration of current asset to current liabilities gives the current ratio, there is no impact of transaction on the current ratio, since the transaction doesn't affect both the
current asset to current liabilities
Answer:
D. Tasha: "If coffee drinkers expect the price of coffee to rise next month, then current demand will go up and lead to a price increase this month."
This is the only one with incorrect economic analysis
Explanation:
A. is correct because a shortage of supply would drop the price as we can see in the Graph 1 with the supply curve.
B. is correct because if the two goods are substitues then a lower price for caffeinated soft drinks like Mountain Dew would cause the consumer demand for coffe to go down because the consumers would prefer the good with lower price, rising the demand for Mountain dow in detriment of coffe.
C. is correct as we can see in the Graph 1, the increse in the demand would generate a higher price but it would make the demand go back to D1
D. is incorrect because if coffee drinkers consume more coffee this monht the price would lower.
Answer:
violation/accident.
Explanation:
Its violation because its a violation to the property, but you also can use accident because it mean a situation not done on purpose or something unexpected which will cause damage or injury.
Answer:
a) Marginal cost of waiting is greater than the marginal benefit of being served
Explanation:
For an economic perspective, customer leave a fast food restaurant as they find the marginal cost of waiting is higher than the cost of marginal benefit of being served at restaurant.
Marginal cost: In economics, it is a cost that is incurred for an additional unit of benefit received out of certain action or activity.
Marginal benefit: It is a benefit received for an additional unit of cost incurred during the activity taken place.
Therefore, customer have done analysis on the benefit of waiting in a queue for getting served at restaurant, which he found that marginal cost is greater than the marginal benefit of being served.
