Answer:
c. No. The taste buds get replaced every ten days or so, so he is likely to regain his sense of taste.
Explanation:
Our taste buds are the taste receptor cells that allow us to specify the type of taste that we can detect as sweet, sour, salty, bitter, etc. These taste buds are located at the upper surface of the tongue and detect the type of taste that comes from the foods we consume.
So, even though the man may think his taste buds are permanently damaged, that is not the case. Taste buds can be permanently damaged but only in cases of burning the tongue with hot foods. Since spices can't damage taste buds, his opinion of his taste buds permanently damaged is wrong. Our taste buds get replaced every 10 days or two weeks. So, in his case, he will regain his taste buds after some days.
Therefore, his act of suing the local restaurant does not have any merit. Thus, the <u>correct answer is option c</u>.
The Due Process Clause guarantees “due process of law” before the government may deprive someone of “life, liberty, or property”
Answer:
The correct answer would most likely be A.
Explanation:
Because while judicial review mean to decide if the law/act is consistent with constitution. On the other hand judicial activism is more of a behavioral concept of the judge concerned...What im trying to say is that With the power of judicial review, the courts act as a custodian of fundamental rights
Answer:
Yamato's here!
Explanation:
There is many letters in a business. Some are VERY important. Like this one letter here that I got this morning:
Dear enemy,
I do not like you at all, so please do not talk to me. If you do then I will send you this picture but in a different style.
Hate, Your enemy.
(^ - ^ "/) Xoxo, Yamato-