Answer: A) B. F. Skinner
Explanation: Burrhus Frederic Skinner was a well-known American psychologist whose theory of behavior was based on its consequences, that is, behavior is shaped and determined by its consequences. These consequences can be either punishment or reward, and they stipulate that certain behavior is likely to be repeated. This means that, based on, say, a certain reward, a child learns a certain behavior, remembers words or sounds.
Answer:
listen to and compromise with others
Explanation:
<u>Just as any kind of conflict, when group conflict occurs it is vital for all parties to be willing to fully listen to the other side and make a compromise, rather than insist on their ideas and belief. </u>
Groups consist of many people which opens more opportunities for the conflict, and more chances for it to be solved unethically, with one person or one group using the power to solve it in their gain.
<u>That is why everyone's opinions and thoughts must be taken into consideration, and no power performance should be displayed in other to make the decision that is ethically right for all. </u>
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
