Answer:
Yes (It's more inefficient)
Explanation:
in ecology there are things called primary producers (plants) that are eaten by primary consumers (cows and chickens) and then there are humans, secondary consumers, that eat cows and chickens for energy.
The further we move from eating primary producers the more inefficient we become in consuming energy. Meaning, it requires a lot more natural energy consumption to support a human that lives on meat only as compared to a human that eats plants only. this inefficiency only magnifies when communities practice unsustainable food methods.
There are sustainable ways to eat meat, but (at least in the US) our current conventions of meat production are unsustainable and environmentally destructive.
There should be nothing inside the fetal pig
Answer:
The correct answer will be option-B.
Explanation:
<em>Homo neanderthelensis</em> or Neanderthals are the close relatives of the <em>Homo sapiens</em> or modern humans which became extinct around 10,000 years ago.
The Neanderthals and sapiens are the two related species of the same genus Homo but they showed distinct features like Neanderthals were muscular and shorter in height compared to the <em>Homo sapiens</em>. Recent fossils indicated that Neanderthals and<em> Homo sapiens</em> interbreed in some parts of the world as they were closely related to each other.
Thus, Option-B is the correct answer.
