Given is <span>(x - 4⁸)
</span>Her factors are <span>(x² - 4²)² (x² + 4²)
</span>Let us prove whether her solution is correct or not.
<span>
(x² - 4²)² (x² + 4²)</span>
(x⁴ - 4⁴) (x² + 4²) ; Follow PEMDAS rule as well as exponential multiplication rule which tells that when exponents are multiplied, the exponents will be added.
By using FOIL(First, Outside, Inside, Last) Method, we can prove if Angelina's solution is correct. NOTE: Do not disregard the positive or negative.
(<u>x⁴</u> - 4⁴) (<u>x²</u> + 4²) ; For the First, multiply the first terms. They are underlined.
This gives you a partial answer: x⁶ (Exponential Law of Multiplication is applied)
(<u>x⁴</u> - 4⁴) (x² <u>+ 4²</u>) ; For the Outside, multiply the outside terms. They are underlined. This gives you an additional to the partial answer: x⁶ + 4²x⁴
<span>(x⁴ <u>- 4⁴</u>) (<u>x²</u> + 4²) ; For the Inside, multiply the inside terms. They are underlined. This gives you an additional to the partial answer: </span>x⁶ + 4²x⁴ - 4⁴x²
(x⁴ <u>- 4⁴</u>) (x² <u>+ 4²</u>) ; For the Last, multiply the last terms. They are underlined. This will give you an additional to the final answer: x⁶ + 4²x⁴ - 4⁴x² - 16⁶ = 0
Final Answer in complete sentence:
The result of multiplying the factors is x⁶ + 4²x⁴ - 4⁴x² - 16⁶ = 0 and is too far compared to (x - 4⁸) which is already a factor.
To "rationalize the denominator" is another way to say, getting rid of that pesky radical at the bottom.
we'll simply start by multiplying top and bottom by the "conjugate" of the denominator, recall difference of squares, anyhow, let's do so
Since the figure is a rhombus, the diagonals cut each other at right-angles and bisect each other, namely cut their vertices in equal halves.
what the dickens does all that mean? well, the angles at vertex C and vertex A are all twins, and therefore, ∡BCA = x, therefore
Answer:
6
Step-by-step explanation:
