1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ira Lisetskai [31]
2 years ago
6

Which law gives an organization more instruction and insight into the type of information security plans/policies required

Law
1 answer:
Jobisdone [24]2 years ago
4 0

Information security policy (ISP) is the law that gives organizations and companies insight into the type of plans and policies required for information security. They go over  data leakage, data breaches, snooping, and control to information.

I hope this helps! :)

You might be interested in
Who was the US Bill of Rights designed to protect?
seropon [69]

Answer:

George Mason

have to add things so it will let me answer

it is

7 0
3 years ago
When Lara and Mick cannot resolve their dispute amicably, Lara initiates a lawsuit against Mick. Lara is
DaniilM [7]
Plaintiff is the answer
3 0
1 year ago
How is our society judged?
iVinArrow [24]
A society is judge by its treatment of its weakest and most vulnerable members.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think it was important for congress to finish what they started?
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

it depends

Explanation:

you should finish what you started, so you can achieve your goal and if you start something you dont enjoy your shouldn't continue because you would be wasting your time on things you hate than doing the things you enjoy.

if you start something you that you are bad at, always remember, a quitter never wins but a failure always win.

7 0
2 years ago
A Supreme Court justice who agrees with the majority in a case, but disagrees in whole
igomit [66]

Answer:

concurring

Explanation:

a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different or additional reasons as the basis for their decision.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Match this weakness of the Articles of Confederation to the outcome it caused:
    14·1 answer
  • Cuales son las controversias, hechos, las pruebas, sentencias, los acusados y las victimas en el caso de Escobedo vs Illinois?
    6·1 answer
  • Question 29 (3 points)
    7·1 answer
  • An act under the other acts exception must have occurred
    10·1 answer
  • A example of a question that is not leading
    13·2 answers
  • Was the United States the First Nation to grant universal suffrage by allowing women the right?
    12·1 answer
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
    7·1 answer
  • Please help.........
    10·1 answer
  • In the Legal Language, what is double jeopardy?
    9·2 answers
  • How is the United States not the original Apartheid state?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!