Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

10

Ivers Co. holds $30,000 of available-for-sale securities. Ivers intends to hold these securities for three years. Ivers should r

eport these securities as a(n) ________ on the balance sheet.

1 answer:

bekas [8.4K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

long term assets

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

You might be interested in

Oaktree Company purchased new equipment and made the following expenditures: Purchase price $ 45,000 Sales tax 2,200 Freight cha

olganol [36]

Answer and Explanation:

The journal entries are shown below:

1. Equipment($45,000 + $2,200 + $700 + $1,000) $48,900

To Accounts payable $47,200 ($45,000 + $2,200)

To Cash $1,700

(Being the equipment is purchased on cash and credit)

Since the equipment is purchased so it would be debited and the other two accounts i.e account payable and the cash is credited

2.Prepaid insurance $900

To Cash $900

(Being the payment is recorded)

Since there is a prepaid insurance and the same is increased in assets so it would be debited and the cash is paid so it would be credited

3 0

2 years ago

An investment of $1 each in two different securities led to a value of $11 (Security A) and $16 (Security B), respectively, afte

jonny [76]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The formula for calculating future value:

FV = P (1 + r)^n

FV = Future value

P = Present value

R = interest rate

N = number of years

Security A : 11 = 1( 1 + r)^15

11^(1/15) = 1( 1 + r)

1.173 = 1 + r

r = 1.173 - 1

r = 17.33%

Security A : 16 = 1( 1 + r)^15

16^(1/15) = 1( 1 + r)

1.20 = 1 + r

r = 1.2 - 1

r = 0.2

r = 20%

Security B earned a higher average annual rate of return as 20% is greater than 17.33%

3 0

3 years ago

he following information for Cooper Enterprises is given below: December 31, 2021Assets and obligations Plan assets (at fair val

gavmur [86]

Answer:

the amortization of Other Comprehensive Loss for 2022 is $38,370

Explanation:

The computation of the amortization of Other Comprehensive Loss for 2022 is shown below;

= (Accumulated other comprehensive loss - 10% of Projected benefit obligation) ÷ given no of years

= ($503,700 - 10% of $1,200,000) ÷ given no of years

= ($503,700 - $120,000) ÷ 10 years

= $38,370

hence, the amortization of Other Comprehensive Loss for 2022 is $38,370

The same would be considered

7 0

2 years ago

The following are the cash flows for each of the independent cases. Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Cash provided by (used for) operating a

Travka [436]

Answer and Explanation:

The classification is as follows

For case 1

It is a growing start-up company (S) with the following reasons

a. The cash flow from operating activities is very less as compared to the financing and investing activities

b. It is a start company so in this case the financing and investing activities are more

c. Moreover, the beginning cash balance is also less

For case 2

It is an established company facing financial difficulties (F) with the following reasons

a. The operating activity is in a negative amount

b. It is an established company so it facing a lot of difficulties

c. Net cash flow is also in negative

For case 3

It is a healthy established company (E) with the following reasons

a. The operating activity is in a positive amount

b. Since it is a healthy established company so it shows the positive net cash flow and strong cash position

6 0

3 years ago

Cutler Petroleum, Inc., is trying to evaluate a generation project with the following cash flows:Year Cash Flow0 –$ 39,800,000 1

muminat

Answer:

The two IRRs are: - 76.49% and 36.79%

Explanation:

To simplify our "Hard work", let's denote the cash flow numbers in terms of '000 (To reduce the number of zeros).

IRR is that discount rate R, for which NPV = 0

NPV is the sum of discounted cash inflows and outflows. Therefore,

NPV ($'000) = - 39,800 + (63,800 / (1 + R) - [12,800 / (1 + R)2]

When NPV = 0 [If R is the IRR],

0 = - 39,800 + [(63,800 / (1 + R)] - [12,800 / (1 + R)2]

[12,800 / (1 + R)2] - [(63,800 / (1 + R)] + 39,800 = 0

To simplify further, let's put N = 1 + R. Also, let's divide both sides by 200 [Note: We're only doing arithmetical simplification to reduce the large numbers]]:

[64 / (N)2] - (319 / N) + 199 = 0

Multiplying all terms by (N2):

64 - 319N + 199 (N)2 = 0

that is,

199 (N)2 - 319N + 64 = 0

This is a quadratic equation with large coefficients. Solving quadratic equation is outside scope of this question (it belongs to Algebra), so I've used an Online Quadratic equation solver**, which returns following values of N:

N = 1.3679, and N = 0.2351

So:

1 + R = 1.3679, Or 1 + R = 0.2351

R = (1.3679 - 1) or R = (0.2351 - 1)

R = 0.3679 or R = - 0.7649

The two IRRs are: - 76.49% and 36.79%

4 0

3 years ago