Answer:
consumption of tea will <u>increase</u> , and marginal utility of coffee will <u>increase</u>
Explanation:
As Consumer consumes both tea & coffee, they are substitutes goods (which can be inter change-ably used by consumer).
Substitute Goods' price & quantity are inversely related. Such because -
- Price fall of a good makes it relatively cheaper & increases its quantity demanded, decreases other good's demand.
- Price fall of a good makes it relatively expensive & decreases its quantity demanded, increases other good's demand
So: Tea & Coffee being substitutes - If price of coffee rise, its own quantity demanded decreases & tea demand increases.
Coffee quantity demanded decrease means Marginal Utility of coffee will increase, as - MU decreases with more consumption quantity & it increases with less quantity consumption [as per Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility].
A particular concept that I've learned based on the experiences that I e had is that it's always good to be kind to people.
While growing up, my parents taught us that it's always good to be kind to others. There was a particular day that a friend mine needed $50. I had $60 with me and I gave him the $50. He was grateful and I was glad that I helped him.
It should be noted that perceptual set influences the way that we perceive other people. Each individual has their own perception of others. In this case, I believed that he needed the money and I gladly helped him.
Learn more about experiences on:
brainly.com/question/11659506
The correct answer is letter B.
Explanation: All the others were eliminated because they were not right.
Answer:
<em>a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer.</em>
Explanation:
<em>An algorithm is a step procedure to solve logical and mathematical problems.</em>
Answer:
The inference that is best supported by the passage is: A. Prior to the "Click it or Ticket" law, motorist could not be stopped simply for not waring a seatbelt."
Explanation:
In the passage is very clear that in the new law motorist can be now pulled over and ticketed for not wearing seatbelts (later in the passage it implies that's the reason why lawyers and citizens' gorups are protesting), which implies that before the state legislature passed the law this was not a reason to be pulled over even though this is not stated in the passage, the entire text circles around the novelty of pulling over motorist for not wearing seatbelt, therefore the best option is A especially because that is the main idea of the text.
