1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksi-84 [34.3K]
3 years ago
11

What is hebas courpus petition explain in breif ​

Law
2 answers:
aliina [53]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

  • Habeas Corpus' literally means “to have a body of”. This writ is used to release a person who has been unlawfully detained or imprisoned. By virtue of this writ, the Court directs the person so detained to be brought before it to examine the legality of his detention.
<h3>Sorry for short answer</h3><h3>Hope this helps you XD ✌️</h3>

9966 [12]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Habeas corpus is a recourse in law through which a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court and request that the court order the custodian of the person, usually a prison official, to bring the prisoner to court, to determine whether the detention is lawful.

You might be interested in
How has the confirmation power change reflected<br> political trends in American government?
lukranit [14]

Answer:

Key points

The Framers of the US Constitution structured the government so that the three branches have separate powers. The branches must both cooperate and compete to enact policy.

Each of the branches has the power to check the other two, which ensures that no one branch can become too powerful and that government as a whole is constrained.

This structure ensures that the people’s will is represented by allowing citizens multiple access points to influence public policy, and permitting the removal of officials who abuse their power.

The structure of US government: separation of powers

By the late 1780s, it had become clear that the first governmental system of the United States, the Articles of Confederation, wasn’t working. The central government under the Articles lacked a strong executive and a method for resolving disputes at the national level.

But adding a strong executive branch to the US government might pose the opposite problem. Would an executive, wielding the power of the army, become too powerful? Would a federal government with more power overall soon become tyrannical?

At the Constitutional Convention, the Framers debated these issues. Their ultimate solution was to separate the powers of government among three branches—legislative, executive, and judicial—so that each branch had to cooperate with the others in order to accomplish policymaking goals. For example, although the executive branch commands the military, only the legislative branch can declare war and make funds available to pay and provision the army. Therefore, both the legislative branch (Congress) and the executive branch (the president) must consent for the United States to go to war.

Accordingly, each branch of government has unique powers. As the branch most responsive to the will of the people (who elect its members), Congress has the power to pass laws, declare war, ratify treaties, and levy taxes. The executive branch conducts foreign affairs and commands the armed forces. The judicial branch interprets the laws of Congress and the actions of the president to determine whether they are constitutional.

Powers of the branches of government

Legislative branch

Executive branch

Judicial branch

Pass laws Veto legislation Declare laws unconstitutional

Declare war Command armed forces Hear cases on federal law

Impeach president and judges Grant pardons Preside over impeachment trials

Approve presidential appointments Appoint judges, ambassadors, department heads Declare presidential acts unconstitutional

Ratify treaties Conduct foreign affairs and negotiate treaties

Levy taxes  

Establish number of Supreme Court justices  

Regulate Supreme Court's jurisdiction  

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
1. The Articles of Confederation was adopted by Congress in ______ but not ratified until _____.​
nadezda [96]

Answer:

The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States, on November 15, 1777. However, ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not occur until March 1, 1781

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Is capital punishment appropriate in some offenses other than murder? Support your answer with legal reasoning. Is the manner in
Stels [109]

Answer:

Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the state-sanctioned killing of a person as punishment for a crime. The sentence ordering that someone is punished with the death penalty is called a death sentence, and the act of carrying out such a sentence is known as an execution.

8 0
3 years ago
Delete my post again and your not using this no more
frez [133]

Answer:

whatever you want to do it again lol I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. Why should one avoid bad deeds?​
larisa86 [58]

One should avoid bad deeds because it is ethically and morally wrong. In a religious perspective it is wrong, for example, to put on a blood transfusion. Based on the article (Accept or Refuse Blood Transfusion) states: Professor Gerhard von Rad has pointed out that Genesis 9:3, 4 “is not an isolated ‘dietary law’ at all . . . but an ordinance for all mankind.” (Genesis​—A Commentary, 1961) Remember, too, that in Genesis 9:3-6 the prohibition on blood was linked with God’s statement about man’s having even higher regard for the life of other humans. Rabbi Benno Jacob observed:

“The two prohibitions belong together. . . . The permission to eat meat, but without its blood, and the prohibition against shedding human blood indicate the place of man within the world of the living . . . In summary: the reason for the prohibition of blood is of a moral character. . . . Later Judaism regarded this passage as establishing fundamental ethics for every human being.”

And, In society, it is wrong for a minor to be with a person who is older than themselves, steal, or cheat on a spouse. We avoid bad deeds in order to have a clean conscious, to oblige with society rules, to be ok with others, to not disobey the norms of a law, etc. In conclusion, there are many reason to avoid bad deeds. Be it personal, because of society or religious.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Law School Admissions Test (LSAT) is designed to measure someone’s ability to think logically. This ability is predictive of
    10·1 answer
  • What was the result in the case of U.S. v. Park, the case in which the defendant, the president of a national food-chain corpora
    11·1 answer
  • The beliefs listed belong to which political party?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a primary source?
    7·1 answer
  • What types of offenders and offense should bail be denied ?
    11·1 answer
  • FAST PLEASE ANSWER!!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • Differentiate stare decisis from Eminent Domain
    11·1 answer
  • Wairimu aged 17 years entered into an agreement with Patel in which Wairimu agreed to supply Patel with old Jerry cans for recyc
    8·1 answer
  • Can law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own?​
    5·1 answer
  • Paragraph #1
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!