1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
S_A_V [24]
2 years ago
10

A disadvantage of a short-term contract as an alternative on the make-or-buy continuum is that ______. Multiple choice question.

the supplying firm has a shorter planning period than it has for individual transactions the supplying firm has little reason to perform transaction-specific investments the buying firm can get a lower price for the work because of the competitive bidding process the supplying firm has a longer planning period in comparison to individual market trans
Business
1 answer:
Serggg [28]2 years ago
8 0

A disadvantage of a short-term contract as an alternative on the make-or-buy continuum is that: B. the supplying firm has little reason to perform transaction-specific investments.

A short-term contract can be defined as a fixed term contractual agreement between two or more parties that has a definite duration of not more than one year or 24 months.

Hence, a short-term contract is characterized by a specific and limited amount of time.

A make-or-buy continuum can be defined as an act of making a strategic choice between manufacturing (making) a product internally (in-house) or buying the product from an external supplier.

Basically, one of the disadvantages of using a short-term contract as an alternative to the make-or-buy continuum is that, the supplying firm has little or no reason to perform transaction-specific investments i.e a non-transferable investment that has a unique utility.

Read more; brainly.com/question/23439561?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in
Sean Davis is the owner, president, and primary salesperson for Davis Manufacturing. Because of this, the company's profits are
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

The related cash flows to Sean are as follows;

a. $424,000

b. $592,000

c.$399,808

d. $512,885

Explanation:

In this question, we are asked to calculate cash flows to Davis manufacturing given that debt is issues and equity is issued for a number of hour-week

We proceed as follows;

a. For a 40 - hour week and Debt is issued

Mathematically, the cash flow is calculated below as follows;

Cash Flow = EBIT - Interest on debt = $594,000 - ($1.7 million x 10%) = $424,000

b. For a 50 - hour week and Debt is issued

Mathematically, the cash flow is calculated as follows;

Cash Flow = EBIT - Interest on debt = $762,000 - ($1.7 million x 10%) = $592,000

c. For a 40 - hour week and Equity is issued

Mathematically, the cash flow is calculated as follows;

In this case, there will be no interest cost

The firm's value will be increased by the amount of infusion but ownership of sean will be diluted.

New ownership of Sean = $3.5 million / ($3.5 million + $1.7 million) = 0.67307692307

Mathematically, the cash flow is calculated as follows

Cash Flow to Sean = EBIT x new share = $594,000 x 0.67307692307 =  $399,808

d. For a 50 - hour week and Equity is issued

The calculation is as above and there is also no interest course

Cash Flow = EBIT x new share = $762,000 x 0.67307692307 =  $512,885

KINDLY NOTE EBIT IS EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES

5 0
3 years ago
Which scenarios can be considered effects of Sole Sister Shoe Store choosing to sell dress shoes over sneakers? Select two answe
GaryK [48]

Answer:

Option 1 and 2

Explanation:

Complete Question

Which scenarios can be considered effects of Sole Sister Shoe Store choosing to sell dress shoes over sneakers?

CHECK ALL THAT APPLY.

  1. High school athletes stop shopping there.
  2. The inventory of sports socks goes unsold.
  3. Publicity for the store declines.
  4. Profits decline because dress shoes cost less than sneakers

Solution

Sole Sister Shoe Store chooses to sell dress shoes over sneakers because  the customers of sneakers stopped shopping from the store. Sneakers are mainly purchased by the high school athletes over any other footwear. Now, they stopped shopping and hence  Sole Sister Shoe Store started selling dress shoes

Also, sports socks' inventory is unsold indicating the reduction in sale of sneakers and hence the Sole Sister Shoe Store started selling dress shoes

7 0
2 years ago
A stock sells for $12.36 a share and has a required return of 9 percent. Dividends are paid annually and increase at a constant
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

$0.72

Explanation:

The computation of the amount of the last dividend paid is shown below:

Market price of a stock = Last dividend × (1 + growth rate) ÷ Required  rate of return - growth rate

$12.36 = Last dividend × ( 1 + 0.03) ÷ 0.09 - 0.03

$12.36 = Last dividend × (1.03) ÷ 0.06

$12.36 × 0.06 = 1.03 × last dividend

$0.7416 = 1.03 × last dividend

So,

last dividend is

= $0.7416 ÷ 1.03

= $0.72

7 0
3 years ago
On January 1, year 1, Dave received 1,000 shares of restricted stock from his employer, RRK Corporation. On that date, the stock
butalik [34]

Answer:

Taxes on January 1, year 1= $1400

Taxes on Dec 31, year 4=$3300

Explanation:

The question relates to 'EQUITY GRANT', which is some sort of compensation given to somebody, especially/specifically to employees of an entity provided that certain conditions/vesting requirements are satisfied by the employee.

Now on January 1, year 1 Dave has received 1000 shares, for him the shares received is treated is income for Dave, as the shares are being offered against certain services rendered by Dave to RRK corporation. So on January 1 Dave would record income and pay income tax as follows:

Value of shares on Jan 1/ income= 1000×$7

Value of shares on Jan 1/ income= $7000

<em>Lets assume income tax is 20% and marginal tax rate is 10%,</em> the tax consequences would be as follows:

TAXES = $7000×20%

TAXES = $1400

There will be no tax consequences at the vesting date and at the end of year 4 (the date when he sells them) there will be tax consequences of $4000.

At year 4 = 1000×$40

Amount realized= $40000 -$7000

Taxes at marginal rate= $33000×10%

Taxes at marginal rate= $3300

(Note: $7000 is subtracted because it's already present in $40000).

8 0
3 years ago
(blank1) is a writer’s early attempt at writing a full message. It is rough and can’t be (blank2) until it is revised and edited
Rufina [12.5K]

Answer:

the answer is g because i jut got the answer correct and because im smart

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jones of San Diego sold Long of Baton Rouge a video system with a $6,000 list price. Sale terms were 2/10, n/30 FOB San Diego. J
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose that the total revenue received by a company selling basketballs is $600 when the price is set at $15 per basketball and
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a goal of federal economic policy? full employment growth a high savings rate Keynesian economics
    13·1 answer
  • June
    9·1 answer
  • Biozone provides its employees career counseling, skills workshops, and networking sessions. This work-life initiative used by B
    8·1 answer
  • Abraham is wanting to move out of his parents house, and must create a budget to see if he can afford the change in expenses. He
    6·1 answer
  • Bonds owned by investors whose names and addresses are recorded by the issuing company, and for which interest payments are made
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a correct description of the crowding-out effect of deficit spending?
    5·1 answer
  • Identify the statement that characterizes the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Multiple Choice It permits an employer to re
    9·1 answer
  • What might cause a demand curve to shift to the right?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!