The answer is articles, hope this helps!
There are many fallacies in this statement. Primarily, the statement uses fallacy that pertains to hasty generalizations that are made from a small sample that is too vague and biased. Another fallacy at work here is the fallacy of appeal to tradition.
<h3>
What fallacy is present in the statement?</h3>
- The particular statement talks about abortion rights in the U.S. and seeks to provide a constitutional basis for the lack of abortion rights for abortion-seeking people in the United States of America.
- The first fallacy is the fallacy of hasty generalizations.
- Sweeping and hasty generalizations and conclusions are made from a relatively small, biased, and vague sample size that does not reflect the full context of the example cited.
- Another fallacy present in the argument is the fallacy that pertains to appeal to tradition.
- Appeal to tradition is applied to arguments where an event or statement is confirmed to be valid and reasonable solely because it has some historical precedent and has been continuing for years, as a tradition.
- Appeal to tradition operates here as a fallacy since the argument seems to make the claim that since abortion has not been obtained through constitutional means, instances of the same can be ruled out totally to make a convenient argument against abortion rights.
Therefore, the argument exhibits two fallacies namely, hasty generalizations and an appeal to tradition.
Learn more about a fallacy here: brainly.com/question/20939336
#SPJ2
Answer:
To benefit colonial peoples
Explanation:
Generally, classical conditioning is involuntary; operant conditioning is voluntary. Classical conditioning denotes the way new responses are learned. Operant conditioning is learning through voluntary behavior and its subsequent consequences. It shows that reinforcement increases behavioral tendencies, whereas punishment decreases them.
