The answer is 91 because the tens place has to be 8 more so in the 80's, 8 would be 8 more than 0 and 0 is not one of the digits and it's a 2 digit number so it can't go to the 100's so 91 is the best answer. I hope this helped you
Answer:
6 and 8
Step-by-step explanation:
All you have to do is find the difference between the numbers in each factor pair and make sure the factors combine to give 48.
2 and 4 . . . . . have a difference of 2, but 2·4 ≠ 48
4 and 6 . . . . . have a difference of 2, but 4·6 ≠ 48
6 and 8 . . . . . have a difference of 2, and 6·8 = 48
24 and 2 . . . . do not have a difference of 2
Answer:
5 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
distance = speed · time
Tom's distance = (50 mi/h)·(2.5 h) = 125 mi
Albert's distance = (65 mi/h)·(2 h) = 130 mi
Albert drove 130 -125 = 5 miles farther than Tom.
Answer:
- we can conclude that for every single unit of : x, y would be increased by 0.2871. and intersection of x and y will be through =1.5974
- it can be concluded that they are strongly positively correlated. There is strong and positive correlation between them. i.e the number of fatal accidents and the drivers under the age of 21
Step-by-step explanation:
WITH THE GIVEN DATA
A ) using regression to investigate the relationship between the number of fatal accidents and the percentage of drivers under the age pf 21
to fit into a regression line we must have ∝ and β
where β =
= 0.2871
and ∝ = y - βx = - 1.5974
regression line = ∝ + β * x
insert values into regression line equation
regression line = -1.5974 + 0.2871 * x
we can conclude that for every single unit of : x, y would be increased by 0.2871. and intersection of x and y will be through =1.5974
B ) conclusion and recommendations can you derive from your analysis
it can be concluded that they are strongly positively correlated. There is strong and positive correlation between them. i.e the number of fatal accidents and the drivers under the age of 21
using the correlation coefficient ( r ) =
= 0.8394