1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
viva [34]
2 years ago
13

Haley and Sabrina are both training for a race.

Mathematics
2 answers:
GarryVolchara [31]2 years ago
7 0
The total number of miles Sabrina will run the following week will be 5.25 miles
scoundrel [369]2 years ago
7 0
5.25 m just make sure once your self
You might be interested in
In the rectangle below,
STALIN [3.7K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

In a rectangle,  diagonals are equal and bisect each other

BE  =   AE

6x - 5 = 2x +  7

6x - 2x - 5 = 7

       4x - 5 = 7

             4x = 7 + 5

             4x = 12

               x = 12/4

               x = 3

AE = 2x + 7

     = 2*3 + 7

    = 6 + 7

AE =  13

AC = 13 + 13

AC = 26

m∠EBC = 50

In rectangle, each angle is 90

m∠ABE + m∠EBC = 90

m∠ABE + 50 = 90

          m∠ABE = 90 - 50

          m∠ABE = 40

In rectangle, AB // DC and DB transversal

m∠ECD = m∠ABE   { alternate interior angles}

m∠ECD = 40

8 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
Write and solve an equation to find the value of x.
Law Incorporation [45]

Answer: y+44+68=180

Step-by-step explanation: y+44 and 68 are complementary angles so they add to equal 180

4 0
2 years ago
It says i got it wrong. What is 360 divide by 10 times 2?
Rufina [12.5K]
The answer is 72 hope that helped love :)<3
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write this as a power of 2. ex ( 2^n) requires knowledge of negative exponents
Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

<h3>22.627417</h3>

Step-by-step explanation:

\frac{32}{ \sqrt[8]{16} }  \\

Simplify

\frac{32}{1.414213562}  \\   \\ = 22.627417

Method 2 :

By rationalizing the denominator

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can I get help on this
    12·1 answer
  • Solve 1/2+1/2x=x^2-7x+10/4x by re-writing the equation as a proportion. Which proportion is equivalent to the original equation?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the equation in point-slope form of the line that passes through the point (-4, 5) and has a slope of 23?
    11·2 answers
  • Need help!!! “What is an equation of the line”??
    12·2 answers
  • Y = (0.99)3t<br> growth or decay??
    12·1 answer
  • X- 0.1x + 2.70 = 56.70 solve for the answer
    8·1 answer
  • What is the axis of symmetry for f(x) = 2x2 − 4x + 5?
    10·2 answers
  • Marley loves to draw and color. She bought 6 boxes of crayons. There are 8 crayons in each box. What is the total number of cray
    10·2 answers
  • Convert 4.06 to a percent. please help, i need this for school and i have to get an 80 on this assignment.
    10·2 answers
  • Please answer the question below:
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!