Answer: yes, it is
Step-by-step explanation:
A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 2 and 3 simultaniously.
n = k(k+1)(k-1)
If k-1 is a multiple of 3, n is divisible by 3, so one of the requirements is ok.
Now, if k-1 is a multiple of 3, it can be even or odd.
if k-1 is even, then it is divisible by 2 and as it is divisible by 3 as well, n is divisible by 6
if k-1 is odd, then k and k+1 is even, hence, divisible by 2.
As n = k(k+1)(k-1), n is also divisible by 6.
Because for example 349+567 is something you need to regroup.You start by the ones.9+7=16. You don't always need to regroup though
The correct answer is A. "separate but equal"
Explanation:
The excerpt presented belongs to the decision taken by Chief Justice Earl Warren (chief judge from 1943- 19539) as part of Brown v. Board of Education. In this, Chief Justice Warren declares integration is a must and the doctrine of "separate but equal" is unconstitutional as he demands "to admit to public schools on a racially nondiscriminatory basis".
Moreover, the doctrine of "separate but equal" defined by the Chief Justice as "inherently unequal" was a strategy and phrase opponents of integration used to avoid the process of integration as this implied building separated facilities for non-whites and claiming these facilities offered the same conditions. However, this doctrine still promoted discrimination as non-whites were not admitted or accepted in white schools. Moreover, in most cases the education offered and conditions were unequal. According to this, the phrase or doctrine used to drag out the process of desegregation or slow down integration is "separate but equal"
Answer:
$4,100
Step-by-step explanation:
600 x $5 = $3000
$3000 + $500 = $3500
$3500 + $200 + $200 + $200 = $4100
Thanks to
27turekkm
The selling price will be $192
$120 x 60% = $72 markup
$120 + $72 = $192
