The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.
Answer:
No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.
Answer:
it's illegal
Explanation:
if your going to build a road through someone house you need permission regardless of you are
Answer:
We know that a federalist is someone who supports a government system in which states are under the "control" of central power. Anti-federalists are the opposite. They oppose a central government, and it's mostly in fear that the government will become too powerful. They believe a strong central government could get in the way of rights and individual freedom.
Explanation:
