<h2>
The following is the classification of each pair of variables into two categories, namely explanatory and response, based on the relation between the variables:
</h2><h2>
</h2>
(a) Whether or not a person likes to sing and whether or not a person likes to dance - Explanatory: There is no direct relation between the choices made by the person but it can be explained why he likes or does not like either of two or both.
(b) The number of pages in a textbook and the cost of a new copy of the textbook - Response: The cost of the book is dependent on the pages in it as each page bears some cost.
(c) The number of alcoholic drinks consumed and the blood alcohol content - Response: The blood alcohol content would keep increasing as long as alcohol is consumed.
(d) In a study of adolescents, the dose of vitamin D given each day for a year (50, 100, or 200 international units) and the change in total bone mineral content from the beginning of the study to the end of the study - Response: The amount of vitamin D would reflect as more in the adolescents that were administered higher dosages of vitamin D.
The concept of a good argument is of course quite vague, if
an argument has only one or more false premises, then it is not a good
argument. Unless the premises of an argument are all true, then it would have
no reason to accept to accept its conclusion. In my line of my work In Home Health
Care there is always a good argument to go on.
In the early 1900's , a company often provided a company town, a place where the worker could live in the near working location ( usually like a mining location)
The workers usually were lured by the promise of high wage.
But here's the thing, in company town, a source of living usually can only obtained in a company store, and the cost is really high.
So instead of getting a high wage, the workers trapped in huge debt to the company, creating some sort of slavery that they have to work to pay off their debt to the company
Techincally, the company could easily bring those workers to the court ( even though is very cruel, they obtain the debt in a 'legal' way), so basically workers cant do a thing
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/1112438#readmore
Sorry, but may you add the whole question :(
Answer:
<em>B, Preparing for the experiment, several slides were fixed with dye.</em>
Explanation:
<h3>
Modifiers</h3>
Modifiers are simple words or phrases used to add emphasis to another word in a sentence. Adjectives and adverbs are used to provide emphasis to nouns and verbs respectively. Clauses and phrases can also be used as modifiers in a sentence. <em>The </em><em>nice </em><em>Child; </em><em> </em>In the example, the adjective shows us that the Child is nice and it is the modifier.
<h3>Dangling Modifiers</h3>
A modifier is considered dangling when the word that its will modifier is not contained in the sentence. For example, the nice ........; the nice in this example is dangling because it does not have a word to modify.
Preparing for the experiment, several slides were fixed with dye contains a dangling modifier. "Preparing for experiment" is expressing an action, but the person experimenting is not known. Since the person performing the experiment is not known the phrase "<em>preparing for the experiment</em>" is considered a dangling modifier because it is not modifying any word in the sentence.
