With which Indian tribe(s) did the French have the best relationship?

Social Studies

2 answers:

Masja [62]3 years ago

8 0

The answer to your is that french had have the best relationship with was the Choctaw

Rufina [12.5K]3 years ago

6 0

The Cherokee Indians. If you go back to the time of the revolutionary period, the French and Americans were allies. So Americans had to convince the French to help them win against the British. So therefore, the Cherokee was a friend of the French and then America became allied with France, and France was an enemy of Britain and the New England colonies. Which led them to victory of the revolutionary war. Hope that helps!

You might be interested in

What was the impact on the society from the korematsu vs united states?

kipiarov [429]

The impact was that many people, especially jurists and civil libertarians were troubled that the constitution would allow a racial discrimination. Also, people were arguing that the discrimination was not consequent: it was applied not to all countries with whom US was at war, but only to the US.

6 0

3 years ago

How was segregation similar to slavery?

BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

Because in slavery there was mostly racisem (sorry i cant spell) ;-;

I hope this helps! <3

4 0

3 years ago

A tall organization is characterized by _____.

givi [52]

A tall organization is characterized by D) several management levels, I believe.

8 0

3 years ago

The _______ stipulates that if a state tries to pass a law that conflicts within an area that has federal legislative jurisdicti

disa [49]

There are different kinds of theory. The doctrine of preemption stipulates that if a state tries to pass a law that conflicts within an area that has federal legislative jurisdiction it will be found unconstitutional.

<h3>What is the doctrine of preemption?</h3>

The doctrine of preemption is known to be a theory that is based on the Supremacy Clause. This state that the federal law will preempts state law, even though there is conflict arising due to the laws.

By the above, a federal court does need a state to stop some behavior it believes does interferes with, or may be in conflict with federal law.

Learn more about doctrine of preemption from

brainly.com/question/10270212

6 0

2 years ago

Need help ASAP

m_a_m_a [10]

In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court overturned their previous ruling in Betts v. Brady that states were not required to provide counsel-(c) The Sixth Constitutional amendment was interpreted in both of these case

Explanation:

The sixth Amendment states that the right of counsel is the fundamental right for a free trial
As per the sixth Amendment in the Gideon v. Wainwright,Gideon applead to the court to provide a legal lawyer as he was too poor to pay the fee of the lawyer .So the Sixth amendment was passed,which guarantees the right of counsel is the fundamental right for a free trial.
But in the Betts v. Brady case the Court overruled the the sixth Amendment act which which guarantees the right of counsel is the fundamental right for a free trial.

So , in Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court overturned their previous ruling in Betts v. Brady that states were not required to provide counsel-(c) The Sixth Constitutional amendment was interpreted in both of these case

6 0

3 years ago