<h3>Answer:</h3>
m∠QSW < m∠WQS
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
The question is asking which angle is larger, the one at vertex S or the one at vertex Q? You are expected to understand how angles are named and how angle measure works.
Angles are named by listing points on the rays that make them up, with the vertex point in the middle of the list. ∠QSW is the angle whose vertex is at S. (Since there is only one angle with its vertex at S, it could also be called ∠S.) The letters Q and W help you identify that rays SQ and SW form the sides of the angle.
Likewise, ∠WQS is the angle whose vertex is at Q. It could also be called ∠Q without any confusion. The other letters in the name tell you that rays QW and QS are the sides of the angle.
When the rays that make the sides of an angle are closer together, the angle has a smaller measure.
In a triangle, there are a several different ways to determine which of the angles is larger.
- the larger angle will be opposite the longer side
- the base point of an altitude line will be closer to the larger (acute) angle
- the rays that make up the larger angle will be farther apart (at some given radius from the vertex)
- relative to a perpendicular bisector between the vertices, the vertex of the third angle will be on the side closer to the larger angle (another way to say the relationship of the second point above)
_____
<em>Your triangle</em>
Line segment QW (opposite ∠S) is shorter than line segment SW (opposite ∠Q) so m∠S < m∠Q.
A line segment drawn from W perpendicular to QS is closer to Q, so ∠Q is the larger angle.
Thus we must conclude the measure of ∠QSW is less than the measure of ∠WQS:
... m∠QSW < m∠WQS
_____
<em>Comment on appearances</em>
Here, you're specifically told to go by the appearance of the angles. In most cases, you cannot, as the figures are rarely drawn to scale, and are often drawn to be intentionally misleading.
Answer:
x = 84/5 = 16.8
Step-by-step explanation:
The angle bisector theorem said that
21/15 = x/12
==> 7/5 = x/12
==> x = 84/5
i need to see the venn diagram
if you dont mind can you see if you can answer my question about the spacesuit
Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question:
Step-by-step explanation:
The principal characteristics of algebra, a significant degree of complexity, and the logical scientific evidence or universality of application could be considered as an argument. It often operates in maths without any equivalent concepts and methods throughout the real world. In some cases, computational processes and approaches are applied in different fields without a great understanding of the essence of the process. Another argument is the use of formal logic as well as the accuracy of evidence extracting.
7 apples is how many the fellow purchased