The product value and reputation of Nike, Inc. are being compromised by Nike Shoes.
<h3>
What is the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995?</h3>
The Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 amends the Trademark Act of 1946 to give the owner of a well-known mark the right to an injunction and compensation for another person's commercial use of a mark or trade name if that use starts after the mark has achieved notoriety and lessens the mark's distinctiveness.
It defines the criteria the court will use to decide whether a mark is distinctive. It restricts owners of such marks to injunctive remedies unless the person for whom the injunction is requested acted with malicious intent to exploit the owner's reputation or tarnish the mark. It offers further remedies if such intent is shown to have existed.
A person's possession of a valid registration under a specific Act or on the major register renders them completely immune from legal action taken under common or state law to protect the distinctiveness of a mark, label, or form of advertisement against them with regard to that registration.
Learn more about Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 here:
brainly.com/question/15093618
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": in color.
Explanation:
In order to make a sentence more concise, it is better to avoid redundancies, it is setting aside words that have a similar meaning within the same segment. Redundancies are typically useful for literature when the author wants to emphasize the meaning of something. Though, when talking about scientific facts, it is better not to use them because they tend to confuse the meaning of the message delivered. In:
<em>When the scientists added the final chemical into test tube, the malodorous liquid turned green in color.
</em>
"...in color" does not add meaning to the message. If something turns green it is understood that the color has changed. Thus, to make more concise the sentence we should delete it.
Paying yourself first, sticking to a budget, placing yourself, living within your means, and knowing where your cash goes are all Reverse budgeting.
<h3>What is Reverse budgeting?</h3>
Reverse budgeting is a type of budget system where the business owner sees himself as a staff and pays himself first.
The money left is can then be divides to manage other business operations and saving.
Therefore, Paying yourself first, sticking to a budget, placing yourself, living within your means, and knowing where your cash goes are all Reverse budgeting.
Learn more about Budget here,
brainly.com/question/24940564
#SPJ1
Answer:
a.67.9%.
Explanation:
Debt to Total Assets Ratio = Total Liabilities / Total Assets x 100
<em>Total Liabilities = $95,000,000
</em>
<em>Total Assets = $140,000,000
</em>
Debt to Total Assets Ratio = $95,000,000 / $140,000,000 x 100
Debt to Total Assets Ratio = 0.679 x 100
or
Debt to Total Assets Ratio = 67.9%
Hence, The Assets of Marker Co. are 67.9% funded by creditors.
Answer:
Journal Entry
Explanation:
Cash Dr, $63,360
Loss on sale receivable Dr, $6,640
Receivable from factor Dr, $6,200
To resource liability $4,200
To Accounts receivable $72,000
(Being transfer on the books of Mountain High is recorded)
Working Note :-
2% × $72,000 = $1,440
Cash = ($72,000 × 0.90) - ($72,000 × 0.02)
= $64,800 - $1,440
= $63,360
Loss on sale receivable = ($4,200 + $72,000) - ($63,360 + $6,200)
= $76,200 - $69,560
= $6,640