Answer:
d. cost-less will go out of business, and durable will gain higher power over its customers.
Explanation:
Durable ceramics, inc will only reduce its prices if this is to its advantage. We live in a capitalist world where companies make decisions based on their own benefits. In this case, in order for Durable ceramics, inc to lower its prices and have no losses, it would expand its sales. In this way, Durable ceramics, inc would be able to capture customers from its competitors, and could make them go bankrupt.
Thus, we can conclude that if Durable ceramics, inc reduced its prices, Cost-Less would go out of business and Durable would gain greater power over its customers.
Answer:
Global advertising
Explanation:
Global advertising -
It refers to the method of popularizing a specific goods or services to the whole world , is referred to as global advertising .
Only specific companies or business are able to advertise their products on the global platform and earn some profit .
The example are -
Microsoft , Coca cola , McDonald's etc .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is Global advertising .
The labor force that can be depicted from the information about the people will be 36.
<h3>How to calculate the labor force</h3>
The labor force will be:
= 25 + 8 + 3
= 36
The unemployment rate will be:
= Unemployed/Labor force × 100
= 3/36 × 100
= 8.33%
The participation rate will be:
= Labor force/Adult population × 100
= 36/(80 - 16) × 100
= 56.25%
Learn more about the labor force on:
brainly.com/question/24939447
Answer:
D. May require losing money fighting the first potential entrant.
Explanation:
In this form of gaming, or in this game theory, it is said to be played over and over and could possible be in a probability form that is why that possibly, as a player, you may require loosing money fighting the first potential entrant.
Fighting the first entrant, possibility of cooperating means that their could be a possible compromise in order to carry on accepting a payoff over a certain period of time, knowing that if we do not uphold our end of the deal, our opponent may decide not to either.
Answer:
Had it cut costs and increased its net income by this amount, The ROE would have changed 11.64%.
Explanation:
Old Net profit margin = Net income/ Revenue
= $10,600/$205,000
= 5.170731707%
Old ROE = Net profit margin*Asset turnover*Equity multiplier
= 0.0517*1.33*1.75
= 12.03487805%
New net income = $10,600 + $10,250
= $20,850
New net profit margin = $20,850/$205,000
= 10.17073171%
New ROE = 0.1017*1.33*1.75
= 23.67237805%
Change in ROE = New ROE – Old ROE
= 23.67237805% - 12.03487805%
= 11.6375%
Therefore, Had it cut costs and increased its net income by this amount, The ROE would have changed 11.64%.
