Answer:
(a) Adam Smith - Believed that that in a capitalist, free-market system, all economic agents are coordinated under "the invisible hand", and this results in the benefit of all of them.
(b) Thomas Malthus - Believed that while increased food production rose standards of living, the effect was only temporary, because the same rise in food supply lead to a rise in population growth, and there would a time when there would be too many people to be fed. (the Malthusian Catastrophe).
(c) David Ricardo - He opposed mercantilism, and argued instead that unrestrained free trade benefited every nations. This is because of the concept of comparative advantage: under a free trade systems, nations would specialize in those industries they do best, and import anything that they do not produce.
Toilet palate is good dude
Commit suicide. often people with these type of thoughts like i'm useless, my existence have no meanings and would often take their life in their own hands.,
A lawyer will likely counter this argument by stating that there is no enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority.
<h3>What was the case of Plessy v. Ferguson?</h3>
The federal case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for Black people.
The ruling of the Supreme Court in this case upheld that the Louisiana state law allowed for "equal" but separate accommodations for the white and colored races."
The impact of this ruling was controversial because it set precedent that segregation was acceptable by law.
In conclusion, in this case, the lawyer will likely counter this argument by stating that there is no enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority.
Read more about Plessy v. Ferguson
brainly.com/question/24766692
#SPJ1
I’m gonna have to say C on this one.
