<span>The balance on Feb 1 was $44,100. Find by solving for x, the account balance on Feb 1, knowing that $59,900 was the balance on Feb 28. Find by adding $201,400 of purchases and subtracting $186,500 paid to creditors:
x + 201,400 - 186,500 = 59,000.
x + 201,400 = 245,500
x = 44,100</span>
Answer:
The correct answers are:
a) Family owned restaurant
b) A manufacturer of cars
c) A company that invented a very comfortable razor
Explanation:
First of all, the family who owned a restaurant will be the one that would most likely engaged in advertising due to the fact that they provide a service that has to be known for the people of the community around the place and all the tourists that go that area, meanwhile the other familiy would obviously just sell its products to the better buyer that they could find.
Secondly, the manufacturer of cars would be the one that most likely engaged in advertising due to the fact that they found themselfs in a very competitive and oligopoly market that is the car market and therefore that they highly need to stand out their making them better than the ones from the competitors.
Finally, the company who invented a very comfortable razor would be the one who engaged more in advertising due to the fact that they known they have a better product that the rest of the competitors so they need to take advantage of that and make sure that the consumers know about it and with that they would sell more and therefore invest more in advertising as well.
Answer:
$3,860
Explanation:
The balance in the account Allowance for Doubtful Accounts is expected to be the projected amount in receivables of the company that will not be converting to cash.
Therefore to calculate final balance of allowance for doubtful balance
Beginning balance 2700
Bad debt expense (410000*1%) 4100
Less: Written off -2940
Ending balance 3860
So answer is $3,860
1. True
2. False
3. True
Sorry if I get the wrong answers!!!
The answer is: individual characteristics
In forensic, individual characteristics refers to a trail of evidence that could only be made by someone with a specific background or someone who are used to a certain type of behavior.
From markings and cuts and the sole, investigators could predict the general activities that usually done by the owner of the shoe. This would helped them identify the victim and help to unfold what happened to that victim when the crime occurred.
