Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Because 
is being multiplied by S, we can divide from both sides of the equation. This will give us:
÷
But, that looks a bit hectic. Instead of dividing, you can multiply by the reciprocal (which is essentially how to divide fractions). So, instead of ÷, you get:
×
When multiplying fractions, remember you can just multiply straight across-- numerator x numerator, then denominator x denominator.
By doing that, you get the fraction
cannot be simplified any more, so S= is your answer :)
I hope this helps
Answer:
<em>it's either A or B hope I helped a little</em>
Well basically you just have to chose a number of sides for the side length of the square to be and move those many places to get another vertex of the square. For example if we have (-2,3) and we choose the side lengths to be 4 units than you could move 4 places up, down, left, or right to get the other vertices for the square
Hope that helps :)
Answer:
The answers to the first question are A,C,D
The answer to the second question is YZ=16
Step-by-step explanation:
(1st Question)
Since <K and <M Are equal, and both <L's are equal, KL and ML are congruent (Answer choice) because of the ASA postulate.
You need to create the following equation to find the length of KN and MN 7x-4=5x+12
(Get the "x" variable to one side)
2x-4=12
(Isolate the variable)(Remove the 4)
2x=16
(Divide the 2 by itself to remove it from the x, remember to divide both sides by 2)
x=8 (Answer Choice)
Plug in the x value into each equation
KN= 7(8)-4
KN= 56-4
KN= 52
MN= 5(8)+12
MN= 40+12
MN= 52 (Answer Choice)
MN=KN
(Second Question)
Since XWY(20) is half of XWZ(40), ZWY also equals 20.
This now proves the triangle is congruent by the AAS postulate.
Since the triangles are congruent, if XY = 16, YZ also equals 16.
I don't know but I think it is B) The slope is negative, and a linear model is a good fit for the data.
