For the answer to the questions above, I think the most significant thing is probably manpower. The Romans had the pool of hundreds of thousands of small farmers to draw upon. The Carthaginians used mainly mercenaries and federate.<span>The Roman Govt also seems to have taken the war more seriously, as a 'total war', and mobilized all their resources earlier and more effectively. Combined with their larger manpower this meant they were able to absorb defeats more easily and continue fighting. I have read a book which used the analogy of a disciplined roman 'communist' society fighting a disinterested Carthaginian 'capitalist' society. Romans have a strong government system which is so organized and amazing how they developed that advance system that time
</span>I hope my answer helped you.
Answer:
That is volatility.
Explanation:
Volatility means: <u>liability to change rapidly and unpredictably, especially for the worse</u>. So basically, the answer is volatility because that's what is happening. I don't know if this is right or not but im very sorry if it is wrong. (Also i know i'm late for this)
It should be a because he was using his method of nonviolent protests
