All categories

3 years ago

Can you please help me find X in this problem it is so confusing

Mathematics

1 answer:

Sveta_85 [38]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

x = 25°

Step-by-step explanation:

There are different ways to get there.

The unmarked angle at bottom left is an alternate interior angle with the one at the top marked 50°. So, it is congruent to 50°.

That makes the angles along the line at the bottom be ...

50° +x° +105° = 180° . . . . . the measure of a linear angle

x° = 180° -155° = 25°

The unmarked angle at top right is a same-side interior angle relative to the one at bottom marked 105°. As such it is supplementary to 105°, and has measure ...

180° -105° = 75°

This angle (upper right) is an exterior angle to the triangle. As such, it is equal to the sum of the two "remote" interior angles of the triangle—the ones marked 50° and x°.

75° = 50° +x°

25° = x° . . . . . . . subtract 50°

The unmarked interior angle of the triangle is an alternate interior angle with the one marked 105°. So, it is congruent to 105°. The sum of the triangle interior angles is 180°, so you have ...

x° +50° +105° = 180°

x = 180° -155° = 25° . . . . as we had with our first approach

You might be interested in

Why rotation, reflection, and translation are rigid motion?

rewona [7]

Answer:

Reflections, translations, rotations, and combinations of these three transformations are "rigid transformations". ... A reflection is called a rigid transformation or isometry because the image is the same size and shape as the pre-image.

Hope it helps!!!

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A group of researchers wants to know whether men are more likely than women to contract a novel coronavirus. They surveyed two r

olasank [31]

Answer:

Test statistic Z= 0.13008 < 1.96 at 0.10 level of significance

null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women

Step-by-step explanation:

<em>Step(I)</em>:-

Given surveyed two random samples of 390 men and 360 women who were tested

first sample proportion

$p_{1} = \frac{360}{390} = 0.9230$

second sample proportion

$p_{2} = \frac{47}{52} = 0.9038$

Step(ii):-

Null hypothesis : H₀ : There is no difference proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women

Alternative Hypothesis:-

There is difference between proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women

$Z = \frac{p_{1}- p_{2} }{\sqrt{PQ(\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } } }$

where

$P = \frac{n_{1}p_{1} +n_{2} p_{2} }{n_{1}+n_{2} }$

P = 0.920

$Z= \frac{0.9230-0.9038}{\sqrt{0.920 X0.08(\frac{1}{390}+\frac{1}{52} } )}$

Test statistic Z = 0.13008

Level of significance = 0.10

The critical value Z₀.₁₀ = 1.645

Test statistic Z=0.13008 < 1.645 at 0.1 level of significance

Null hypothesis is accepted

There is no difference proportion of positive tests among men is different from the proportion of positive tests among women

7 0

3 years ago

HELP PLS! ILL MARK BRAINLIEST!

scZoUnD [109]

I think b sorry if it’s wrong :(

8 0

3 years ago

The graph shows the amount of water that remains in a barrel after it begins to leak. The variable x represents the number of da

Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

BRAINLIESTTT ASAP! PLEASE HELP ME :)

11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

<h3>Answer: B) Only the first equation is an identity</h3>

========================

I'm using x in place of theta. For each equation, I'm only altering the left hand side.

Part 1

cos(270+x) = sin(x)

cos(270)cos(x) - sin(270)sin(x) = sin(x)

0*cos(x) - (-1)*sin(x) = sin(x)

0 + sin(x) = sin(x)

sin(x) = sin(x) ... equation is true

Identity is confirmed

---------------------------------

Part 2

sin(270+x) = -sin(x)

sin(270)cos(x) + cos(270)sin(x) = -sin(x)

-1*cos(x) + 0*sin(x) = -sin(x)

-cos(x) = -sin(x)

We don't have an identity. If the right hand side was -cos(x), instead of -sin(x), then we would have an identity.

7 0

3 years ago