1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mina [271]
3 years ago
9

The results of rolling a 6-sided die 120 times are given in the table below.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Bas_tet [7]3 years ago
5 0

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the results of rolling a 6-sided die 120 times, we have:

Rolling a 2:

Experimental = 15/120 = 1/8 = 0.125 = 12.5%

Theoretical = 20/120 = 1/6 = 0.1667 = 16.67%

Rolling a 1:

Experimental = 18/120 = 3/20 = 0.15 = 15%

Theoretical = 20/120 = 1/6 = 0.1667 = 16.67%

Rolling a 1 or 6:

Experimental = 18/120 + 20/120 = 38/120 = 19/60= 0.3167 = 31.67%

Theoretical = 20/120 + 20/120 = 40/120 = 1/3 = 0.3333 = 33.33%

Step-by-step explanation:

1. First of all, let's recall what is the difference between experimental and theoretical probability of an event.

The experimental probability is the result of an experiment, and the theoretical probability is based on the mathematical model developed in the theory of probability.  In simple words, the most important difference is that the experimental probability is based on what actually happens and the theoretical probability on what is expected to happen.

The accuracy of the results of the experiments depends directly on the sample size of the experiment and the accuracy is greater when the sample size is larger.

For this particular event the theoretical probability is the same for rolling each number of the die, 1/6 or 16.67%

Now, let's complete the answer this way:

Rolling a 2:

Experimental = 15/120 = 1/8 = 0.125 = 12.5%

Theoretical = 20/120 = 1/6 = 0.1667 = 16.67%

Rolling a 1:

Experimental = 18/120 = 3/20 = 0.15 = 15%

Theoretical = 20/120 = 1/6 = 0.1667 = 16.67%

Rolling a 1 or 6:

Experimental = 18/120 + 20/120 = 38/120 = 19/60= 0.3167 = 31.67%

Theoretical = 20/120 + 20/120 = 40/120 = 1/3 = 0.3333 = 33.33%

You might be interested in
3(1)+2(_)=6<br><br> plz help on filling in the blank
TEA [102]

Answer:

x = 3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's solve your equation step-by-step.

(3)(1)+2x=6

Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.

(3)(1)+2x=6

3+2x=6

2x+3=6

Step 2: Subtract 3 from both sides.

2x+3−3=6−3

2x=3

Step 3: Divide both sides by 2.

2x/2  3/2

x = 3/2

Hope this helps :)

7 0
3 years ago
If f(x) = 3x5 + 4x3 + 3, then what is the remainder when f(x) is divided by<br> x - 3?
VikaD [51]

Answer:

840

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Verify sin^4 x - sin^2 x = cos^4 x - cos^2 x is an identity
Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

(identity has been verified)

Step-by-step explanation:

Verify the following identity:

sin(x)^4 - sin(x)^2 = cos(x)^4 - cos(x)^2

sin(x)^2 = 1 - cos(x)^2:

sin(x)^4 - 1 - cos(x)^2 = ^?cos(x)^4 - cos(x)^2

-(1 - cos(x)^2) = cos(x)^2 - 1:

cos(x)^2 - 1 + sin(x)^4 = ^?cos(x)^4 - cos(x)^2

sin(x)^4 = (sin(x)^2)^2 = (1 - cos(x)^2)^2:

-1 + cos(x)^2 + (1 - cos(x)^2)^2 = ^?cos(x)^4 - cos(x)^2

(1 - cos(x)^2)^2 = 1 - 2 cos(x)^2 + cos(x)^4:

-1 + cos(x)^2 + 1 - 2 cos(x)^2 + cos(x)^4 = ^?cos(x)^4 - cos(x)^2

-1 + cos(x)^2 + 1 - 2 cos(x)^2 + cos(x)^4 = cos(x)^4 - cos(x)^2:

cos(x)^4 - cos(x)^2 = ^?cos(x)^4 - cos(x)^2

The left hand side and right hand side are identical:

Answer:  (identity has been verified)

3 0
3 years ago
I NEED ANSWER ASAP/ WILL GET 20 PTS
ki77a [65]

Answer: A. (-8,-3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Original formula is f(x)=|x-h|+k, the vertex is (h,k), so a positive h in the formula would turn out negative in the vertex.

4 0
3 years ago
in a program designed to help patients stop smoking 232 patients were given sustained care and 84.9% of them were no longer smok
grandymaker [24]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.849 -0.8}{\sqrt{\frac{0.8(1-0.8)}{232}}}=1.869  

p_v =2*P(Z>1.869)=0.0616  

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of adults were no longer smoking after one month is not significantly different from 0.8 or 80% .  

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=232 represent the random sample taken

X represent the adults were no longer smoking after one month

\hat p=0.849 estimated proportion of adults were no longer smoking after one month

p_o=0.80 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is 0.8.:  

Null hypothesis:p=0.8  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.8  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

3) Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.849 -0.8}{\sqrt{\frac{0.8(1-0.8)}{232}}}=1.869  

4) Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.05. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z>1.869)=0.0616  

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of adults were no longer smoking after one month is not significantly different from 0.8 or 80% .  

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Given the perimeter of a​ square, find the length of one side using the appropriate formula.
    12·1 answer
  • Rachel needs to stop at the florist shop on her way to the hospital to see her Uncle Joey. Each square's side length is 1 block.
    7·1 answer
  • A rectangle is drawn so that the width is 3 feet shorter than the length. The area of the rectangle is 54 square feet. Find the
    5·1 answer
  • Find the length of the diagonal AD in the pentagon ABCDE shown in the coordinate plane.
    10·1 answer
  • What is the answer for this math 4- -13=!
    14·1 answer
  • Write an equation in standard form that has a slip of 6 and passes through (-1,3)
    8·1 answer
  • The stem-and-leaf plot. represents the number of flowers in different public gardens throughout the city. How many gardens have
    5·1 answer
  • 2 doctors is ____% of 25 doctors what do I put in the blank and 9 stores is 3% of ____ stores ?
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ILL MARK BRAINIEST
    8·1 answer
  • 9x + 1 = -26 what is the value of x
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!